Scepticism and the Second Analogy: a modest proposal

Dialogue 18 (1):27-40 (1979)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Despite Decades of scholarly attention certain sections of Kant's first Critique have proved recalcitrant to received readings, canonical interpretations are impossible to come by. Nowhere is this more apparent than in the literature on Kant's treatment of causality in the Second Analogy, where there exists a controversy of many years standing about the success of Kant's arguments in favour of what has come to be known as ‘the causal principle’. For example, contemporary Kant scholars of stature no less than Lewis White Beck and W.H. Walsh argue that Kant offers a uniquely persuasive case for causation. Other interpreters claim that the materials of the Second Analogy fail utterly to provide what is needed to vindicate judgements of cause and effect in a way that would satisfy the sceptic about causation.2 Thus the despairing conclusion of one recent review of the literature on the Second Analogy:It is possible that there lurks somewhere in the pages of the Critique of Pure Reason a convincing reply to Hume's sceptical doubts about the causal principle. But no such reply has yet been brought to light.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,480

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Corporate Punishment: A Proposal. [REVIEW]Robert J. Rafalko - 1989 - Journal of Business Ethics 8 (12):917 - 928.
Modest Scepticism About Rule-Following.Tomoji Shogenji - 1993 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 71 (4):486-500.
A Modest Solution to the Problem of Rule-Following.Frank A. Hindriks - 2004 - Philosophical Studies 121 (1):65-98.
Modest Scepticism.Bruce Freed - 1986 - Dialogue 25 (2):353-.
Metaphysics E 3: A Modest Proposal.Arthur Madigan - 1984 - Phronesis 29 (2):123 - 136.
Harris's Modest Proposal.Michael B. Green - 1979 - Philosophy 54 (209):400 - 406.
Metaphysics E 3: A Modest Proposal.Arthur Madigan - 1984 - Phronesis 29 (2):123-136.
Not a Modest Proposal.John Hymers - 1999 - Ethical Perspectives 6 (2):126-138.
The is-Ought Dichotomy: A Modest Proposal. [REVIEW]James E. Tomberlin - 1972 - Journal of Value Inquiry 6 (1):57-59.


Added to PP

14 (#725,396)

6 months
1 (#417,896)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations