"Remarks about a" General Science of Reasoning

In Friedrich Stadler (ed.), Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook. Springer. pp. 185 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX


As I am not at all a specialist on Gottlob Frege’s work, my comments intended initially to be focused on an aspect that emerges in the last part of Peter Clark’s paper “Frege, neo-logicism and applied mathematics” 1, where he treats the question of “applied mathematics” — an aspect that appealed to me and that was triggered by Frege’s relationship between numbers and concepts, and reasoning. Starting with this concern, I have been led by my subject to propose some considerations about foundations and rationality which will go — briefly — in two directions. The first direction is that of a distinction between logical and rational foundations, whilst the second direction is that of taking into account as a fact the historical development of mathematics among the sciences, which modifies the terms of any foundational program. In delineating these considerations, I found that what I had in mind could apply to mathematics itself as well as to “applied mathematics”, thus deviating somewhat from my first explicit intention. In conclusion I shall consider the possibility of a rational foundation programme for mathematical and physico-mathematical sciences which would take into account the changes in the scientific contents and the widenings of the forms of rationality that, in my view, make these changes possible. Such foundations for knowledge would not be any more static, but dynamical and would be possibly considered only retrospectively: they would be “forward foundations”, in a sense that will be discussed in detail elsewhere



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,261

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Yearning for certainty and the critique of medicine as “science”.Mark H. Waymack - 2009 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 30 (3):215-229.
Science, Pseudo-Science, and Society.Marsha P. Hanen, Margaret J. Osler & Robert G. Weyant (eds.) - 1980 - Waterloo, Ont.: Published for the Calgary Institute for the Humanities by Wilfrid Laurier University Press.
Subjective Probabilities as Basis for Scientific Reasoning?Franz Huber - 2005 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 56 (1):101-116.
The Seven Strategies of the Sophisticated Pseudo-Scientist: a look into Freud’s rhetorical tool box. [REVIEW]Athony A. Derksen - 2001 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 32 (2):329-350.
A comment on Agassi's remarks.Willard Orman Quine - 1988 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 19 (1):117-118.
Gardner on Legal Reasoning.Fábio P. Shecaira - 2014 - Law and Philosophy 33 (6):747-772.
Reasoning with conditionals.Guy Politzer - 2007 - Topoi 26 (1):79-95.
Normative accounting research on the sideline? Some scientific remarks.Rolf Uwe Fulbier & Manuel Weller - 2008 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 39 (2):351-382.


Added to PP

13 (#1,041,239)

6 months
5 (#648,432)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references