Research Integrity and Peer Review 3 (1) (2018)
| Abstract |
Manipulation of the publication process is a relatively new form of misconduct affecting the publishing industry. This editorial describes what it is, why it is difficult for individual journal editors and publishers to handle and the background to the development of the new COPE guidelines on how to manage publication process manipulation.These new guidelines represent an important first step towards encouraging openness and collaboration between publishers to address this phenomenon.
|
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
| Categories |
No categories specified (categorize this paper) |
| ISBN(s) | |
| DOI | 10.1186/s41073-018-0059-x |
| Options |
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Request removal from index
|
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Avoiding Twisted Pixels: Ethical Guidelines for the Appropriate Use and Manipulation of Scientific Digital Images.Douglas W. Cromey - 2010 - Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (4):639-667.
A New Dimension in Publishing Ethics: Social Media-Based Ethics-Related Accusations.Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva & Judit Dobránszki - 2019 - Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society 17 (3):354-370.
Science Journal Editors' Views on Publication Ethics: Results of an International Survey.E. Wager, S. Fiack, C. Graf, A. Robinson & I. Rowlands - 2009 - Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (6):348-353.
An Analysis on the Research Ethics Cases Managed by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) Between 1997 and 2010.Jong Yong Abdiel Foo & Stephen James Wilson - 2012 - Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (4):621-631.
Reconsidering the Role of Research Method Guidelines for Qualitative, Mixed-Methods, and Design Science Research.Philipp Holtkamp, Wael Soliman & Mikko Siponen - 2019 - In Proceedings of the 52nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. pp. 6280-6289.
Notices and Policies for Retractions, Expressions of Concern, Errata and Corrigenda: Their Importance, Content, and Context.Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva & Judit Dobránszki - forthcoming - Science and Engineering Ethics:1-34.
Whose Doctorate is It Anyway? Guidelines for an Agreement Between Adviser and Doctoral Student Regarding the Advisement Process and Intellectual Property Rights.Ora Gilbar, Zeev Winstok, Mickey Weinberg & Orit Bershtling - 2013 - Journal of Academic Ethics 11 (1):73-80.
Notices and Policies for Retractions, Expressions of Concern, Errata and Corrigenda: Their Importance, Content, and Context.Judit Dobránszki & Jaime Teixeira da Silva - 2017 - Science and Engineering Ethics 23 (2):521-554.
Notices and Policies for Retractions, Expressions of Concern, Errata and Corrigenda: Their Importance, Content, and Context.Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva & Judit Dobránszki - 2017 - Science and Engineering Ethics 23 (2):521-554.
Attorney General Forces Infectious Diseases Society of America to Redo Lyme Guidelines Due to Flawed Development Process.L. Johnson & R. B. Stricker - 2009 - Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (5):283-288.
Prior Publication and Redundancy in Contemporary Science: Are Authors and Editors at the Crossroads?Sonia Maria Ramos de Vasconcelos & Miguel Roig - 2015 - Science and Engineering Ethics 21 (5):1367-1378.
A Guide to Applying the Good Publication Practice 3 Guidelines in the Asia-Pacific Region.Hazel Fernandez, Andrew Sakko, Zhigang Ma, Sandeep Kamat, Jose Miguel B. Curameng, Stefanie Chuah, Magdalene Y. S. Chu, Katsuhisa Arai & Blair R. Hesp - 2019 - Research Integrity and Peer Review 4 (1).
The Publication of Ethically Uncertain Research: Attitudes and Practices of Journal Editors.Carla Angelski, Conrad V. Fernandez, Charles Weijer & Jun Gao - 2012 - BMC Medical Ethics 13 (1):4.
What Do Ethical Guidelines for Epidemiology Say About an Ethics Review? A Qualitative Systematic Review.Jan Piasecki, Marcin Waligora & Vilius Dranseika - 2017 - Science and Engineering Ethics 23 (3):743-768.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2020-02-03
Total views
2 ( #1,447,957 of 2,507,332 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #417,155 of 2,507,332 )
2020-02-03
Total views
2 ( #1,447,957 of 2,507,332 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #417,155 of 2,507,332 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads
