Models of Reason, Types of Principles and Reasoning. Historical Comments and Theoretical Outlines

Ratio Juris 1 (2):109-122 (1988)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The author distinguishes between scientific and prudential reason (practical wisdom) in Aristotle with reference to the nature of the principles assumed as premises, and to the method of inference. In the history of thought these two models of reason are elieved not only to be proper to science and, respectively, ethics, but also, at times, to be the scientific model proper to ethics (for example, in natural law doctrines) and the prudential model proper to science. Mixed models are also given in the history of thought: scientific‐prudential (for example, in Thomas Aquinas) and prudential‐scientific. Furthermore, some aspects of the relationship between authority and reason are examined.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 106,506

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Kant’s Quasi‐Eudaimonism.Erica A. Holberg - 2018 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 56 (3):317-341.
Is ethics rationally required?Alison Hills - 2004 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 47 (1):1 – 19.
Multivariate Models of Scientific Change.Miriam Solomon - 1994 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1994:287 - 297.
When scientific models represent.Daniela M. Bailer-Jones - 2003 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 17 (1):59 – 74.
As in Heaven: The Moral Law Within.Mary Claire Macleod - 2000 - Dissertation, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Science as public sphere?Jesús Vega Encabo & F. Javier Gil Martín - 2007 - Social Epistemology 21 (1):5 – 20.
The cognitive structure of scientific theories.Ronald N. Giere - 1994 - Philosophy of Science 61 (2):276-296.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-11

Downloads
36 (#701,572)

6 months
8 (#520,880)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

A Formal Model of Legal Argumentation.Giovanni Sartor - 1994 - Ratio Juris 7 (2):177-211.
Jumps and logic in the law.Aleksander Peczenik - 1996 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 4 (3-4):297-329.
Law, Morality, Coherence and Truth.Aleksander Peczenik - 1994 - Ratio Juris 7 (2):146-176.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Taking rights seriously.Ronald Dworkin (ed.) - 1977 - London: Duckworth.
An essay concerning human understanding.John Locke - 1689 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by Pauline Phemister.
An Essay Concerning Human Understanding.John Locke - 1979 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 169 (2):221-222.
Taking Rights Seriously.Ronald Dworkin - 1979 - Mind 88 (350):305-309.

View all 13 references / Add more references