In Defence of the 'Third Thing Argument': A Reply to James Furner's 'Marx's Critique of Samuel Bailey'

Historical Materialism 14 (2):149-168 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,347

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-10

Downloads
47 (#340,845)

6 months
7 (#440,443)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

J. Patrick Murray
Creighton University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The New Dialectic and Marx's Capital.Christopher J. Arthur - 2004 - Science and Society 68 (4):513-515.
Marx's Concept of Intrinsic Value.Andrew J. Kliman - 2000 - Historical Materialism 6 (1):89-114.
The New Giant's Staircase.Patrick Murray - 2005 - Historical Materialism 13 (2):61-84.
Marx's Critique of Samuel Bailey.James Furner - 2004 - Historical Materialism 12 (2):89-110.

View all 6 references / Add more references