Debating point: Questioning values

Health Care Analysis 6 (4):352-359 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

ConclusionThe whole subject of values is surrounded by partiality, ignorance, confusion and ambiguity from the conceptual level down to the nitty gritty level of everyday practice. Some of these problems have been exposed in a preliminary way in this paper. A great deal more, and more detailed, work at conceptual and practical levels needs to be undertaken before we can really start to talk intelligibly and in a non-confusing way about value and values. One thing is clear. We will never completely escape from the relativity and conceptual slipperiness that inheres in the very nature of valuing some things over others. Values are created in an ongoing dynamic process, not revealed. In the short-term, however, this knowledge will not convince politicians and other ideologues that values may not be in and of themselves a wholly desirable thing!

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Debating point.Udo Schüklenk - 1994 - Health Care Analysis 2 (3):253-261.
Debating point.Per Sundström - 1994 - Health Care Analysis 2 (1):60-64.
Debating point.Ani B. Satz - 1996 - Health Care Analysis 4 (1):80-84.
Debating point.Katherine Hall - 1994 - Health Care Analysis 2 (4):336-338.
Debating point-comment.B. Nelson - 1995 - Health Care Analysis 3 (2):148-149.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-02-04

Downloads
11 (#1,110,001)

6 months
1 (#1,510,037)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

After Virtue.A. MacIntyre - 1981 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 46 (1):169-171.

Add more references