Belief in a Fallen World

Res Philosophica 95 (3):531-559 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In an ideal epistemic world, our beliefs would correspond to our evidence, and our evidence would be bountiful. In the world we live in, however, if we wish to live meaningful lives, other epistemic strategies are necessary. Here I attempt to work out, systematically, the ways in which evidentialism fails us as a guide to belief. This is so preeminently for lives of a religious character, but the point applies more broadly.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 79,794

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Fallen Nature, Fallen Selves.Michael Moriarty - 2007 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 69 (2):388-388.
God, Hume and Natural Belief.J. C. A. Gaskin - 1974 - Philosophy 49 (189):281-294.
God and the external world.Martin Smith - 2011 - Ratio 24 (1):65-77.
Fallen nature, fallen selves: Early modern French thought II (review).David Cunning Seth Jones - 2008 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 46 (4):pp. 644-645.
On the difference it makes.Arthur B. Cody - 1969 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 12 (1-4):394 – 405.
Belief-in and Belief in God.John N. Williams - 1992 - Religious Studies 28 (3):401-405.
Hyperspace and the Best World Problem: A Reply to Hud Hudson. [REVIEW]Michael C. Rea - 2008 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 76 (2):444 - 451.
Practices of Belief: Volume 2, Selected Essays.Terence Cuneo (ed.) - 2010 - Cambridge University Press.
Rationality of Religious Belief.Grant Rehr - 2016 - Dissertation, University of Reading
Icarus fallen: the search for meaning in an uncertain world.Chantal Delsol - 2003 - Wilmington, Del.: ISI Books. Edited by Robin Dick.
Reasons and Perception.Declan Smithies - 2018 - In Daniel Star (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Reasons and Normativity. Oxford University Press. pp. 631-661.
Why believe?John Cottingham - 2009 - New York: Continuum.
A formal model of multi-agent belief-interaction.John Cantwell - 2006 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 15 (4):397-422.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-08-14

Downloads
48 (#255,954)

6 months
2 (#319,485)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Robert Pasnau
University of Colorado, Boulder

Citations of this work

Belief, Credence, and Evidence.Elizabeth Jackson - 2020 - Synthese 197 (11):5073-5092.
Belief, Credence, and Faith.Elizabeth Jackson - 2019 - Religious Studies 55 (2):153-168.
Belief and Credence: A Defense of Dualism.Elizabeth Jackson - 2019 - Dissertation, University of Notre Dame

Add more citations

References found in this work

Belief, credence, and norms.Lara Buchak - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 169 (2):1-27.
The epistemic significance of disagreement.Thomas Kelly - 2005 - In Tamar Szabó Gendler & John Hawthorne (eds.), Oxford Studies in Epistemology, Volume 1. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 167-196.
Epistemic Teleology and the Separateness of Propositions.Selim Berker - 2013 - Philosophical Review 122 (3):337-393.
No Exception for Belief.Susanna Rinard - 2017 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 94 (1):121-143.

View all 59 references / Add more references