A Note on the Issue of Cohesiveness in Canonical Models

Journal of Logic, Language and Information 29 (3):331-348 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In their presentation of canonical models for normal systems of modal logic, Hughes and Cresswell observe that some of these models are based on a frame which can be also thought of as a collection of two or more isolated frames; they call such frames ‘non-cohesive’. The problem of checking whether the canonical model of a given system is cohesive is still rather unexplored and no general decision procedure is available. The main contribution of this article consists in introducing a method which is sufficient to show that canonical models of some relevant classes of normal monomodal and bimodal systems are always non-cohesive.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

K1.1 Is Not Canonical.G. Hughes & M. Cresswell - 1982 - Bulletin of the Section of Logic 11 (3-4):109-112.
Quasi-modal equivalence of canonical structures.Robert Goldblatt - 2001 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 66 (2):497-508.
A Non-standard Injection Between Canonical Frames.Timothy Surendonk - 1996 - Logic Journal of the IGPL 4 (2):273-282.
Finite models constructed from canonical formulas.Lawrence S. Moss - 2007 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 36 (6):605 - 640.
Graded modalities, II (canonical models).Francesco Caro - 1988 - Studia Logica 47 (1):1 - 10.
Quasi-Modal Equivalence of Canonical Structures.Robert Goldblatt - 2001 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 66 (2):497-508.
Partiality and Adjointness in Modal Logic.Wesley H. Holliday - 2014 - In Rajeev Goré, Barteld Kooi & Agi Kurucz (eds.), Advances in Modal Logic, Vol. 10. College Publications. pp. 313-332.
Action Emulation between Canonical Models.Floor Sietsma & Jan van Eijck - 2013 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 42 (6):905-925.
Elementary Canonical Formulae: A Survey on Syntactic, Algorithmic, and Modeltheoretic Aspects.W. Conradie, V. Goranko & D. Vakarelov - 1998 - In Marcus Kracht, Maarten de Rijke, Heinrich Wansing & Michael Zakharyaschev (eds.), Advances in Modal Logic. CSLI Publications. pp. 17-51.
Generalized cohesiveness.Tamara Hummel & Carl G. Jockusch - 1999 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 64 (2):489-516.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-10-08

Downloads
17 (#846,424)

6 months
6 (#504,917)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Matteo Pascucci
Slovak Academy of Sciences

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

A New Introduction to Modal Logic.M. J. Cresswell & G. E. Hughes - 1996 - New York: Routledge. Edited by M. J. Cresswell.
Modal Logic.Yde Venema, Alexander Chagrov & Michael Zakharyaschev - 2000 - Philosophical Review 109 (2):286.
Modal logic and classical logic.Johan van Benthem - 1983 - Atlantic Highlands, N.J.: Distributed in the U.S.A. by Humanities Press.
Semantic analysis of tense logics.S. K. Thomason - 1972 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 37 (1):150-158.
Some embedding theorems for modal logic.David Makinson - 1971 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 12 (2):252-254.

View all 13 references / Add more references