What Proto-logic Could not be

Axiomathes 32 (6):1451-1482 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Inspired by Bermúdez’s notion of proto-logic, I would like to fathom what the true proto-logic could be like. But this will be approached only in a negative way of figuring out what it could not be. I shall argue that it could not be purely deductive by exploiting the recent researches in logic of maps. This will allow us to reorient the search for proto-logic, starting with animal abduction. I will also suggest that proto-logic won’t get off the ground without proto-geometry. These negative results will shed some lights on some further conceptual and historical issues around the language of thought hypothesis to arrive at the true proto-logic.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 107,650

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-08-03

Downloads
44 (#601,955)

6 months
10 (#520,782)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Woosuk Park
Korea Advanced Institute of Science & Technology (KAIST)

References found in this work

Mind and World.John McDowell - 1996 - Philosophical Quarterly 46 (182):99-109.
Some philosophical problems from the standpoint of artificial intelligence.John McCarthy & Patrick Hayes - 1969 - In B. Meltzer & Donald Michie, Machine Intelligence 4. Edinburgh University Press. pp. 463--502.
Inquiry.Robert Stalnaker - 1984 - Synthese 79 (1):171-189.
Abduction, Reason, and Science.L. Magnani - 2001 - Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
Renewing Philosophy.Hilary Putnam - 1992 - Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

View all 50 references / Add more references