Ur-Emotions: The Common Feature of Animal Emotions and Socially Constructed Emotions

Emotion Review 4 (3):247-248 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Comparison of human and animal emotions reveals a fuzzy yet discernible boundary. Their undeniable similarities are more aptly described as ur-emotions than as basic emotions. This article describes how the concept of ur-emotion can be useful to animal researchers as well as to social constructionists by making sense of emotional variation both across species and across cultures

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-02

Downloads
40 (#389,966)

6 months
2 (#1,240,909)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Emotion.Charlie Kurth - 2022 - New York, NY: Routledge.
Basic Emotions: A Rejoinder.William A. Mason & John P. Capitanio - 2012 - Emotion Review 4 (3):251-252.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Basic Emotions or Ur-Emotions?Nico H. Frijda & W. Gerrod Parrott - 2011 - Emotion Review 3 (4):406-415.
The sophistication of non-human emotion.Robert C. Roberts - 2009 - In Robert W. Lurz (ed.), The Philosophy of Animal Minds. Cambridge University Press. pp. 145--164.

Add more references