Uncomfortably Close to Human

Feminist Philosophy Quarterly 8 (3) (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Social robots are marketed as human tools promising us a better life. This marketing strategy commodifies not only the labor of care but the caregiver as well, conjuring a fantasy of technoliberal futurism that echoes a colonial past. Against techno-utopian fantasies of a good life as one involving engineered domestic help, I draw here on the techno-dystopian television show Humans (stylized HUMⱯNS) to suggest that we should find our desires for such help unsettling. At the core of my argument is a return of the “uncanny valley” problem, from its reformulation as an engineering/design problem to its origins as a psychosocial symptom of an unresolved, traumatic past. I conclude that our sense of the uncanny may be best understood as a moral capacity that should be honed rather than evaded.

Similar books and articles

The End of the World. [REVIEW]Kent A. Peacock - 1999 - Dialogue 38 (3):650-652.
Human Rights and the Minimally Good Life.Nicole Hassoun - 2013 - Res Philosophica 90 (3):413-438.
Cobots, “co-operation” and the replacement of human skill.Tom Sorell - 2022 - Ethics and Information Technology 24 (4):1-12.
Can we wrong a robot?Nancy S. Jecker - 2023 - AI and Society 38 (1):259-268.
A Human Right to Relationships?Stephanie Collins - 2022 - In Kimberley Brownlee, Adam Neal & David Jenkins (eds.), Being Social: The Philosophy of Social Human Rights. Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-12-25

Downloads
238 (#80,920)

6 months
118 (#29,173)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Shelley M. Park
University of Central Florida

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references