Public War and the Moral Equality of Combatants

Journal of Military Ethics 11 (4):2012 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Following Hugo Grotius, a distinction is developed between private and public war. It is argued that, contrary to how most contemporary critics of the moral equality of combatants construe it, the just war tradition has defended the possibility of the moral equality of combatants as an entailment of the justifiability of public war. It is shown that contemporary critics of the moral equality of combatants are denying the possibility of public war and, in most cases, offering a conception of just war as exclusively private war. The work of Jeff McMahan is used to exemplify this. Against these contemporary critics, it is argued that the reasons McMahan and others offer against the possibility of the moral equality of combatants undermine not only public war but also the possibility of fully realized and effective political authority.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,659

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-02-13

Downloads
66 (#243,569)

6 months
8 (#529,728)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Graham Parsons
United States Military Academy

References found in this work

Just and Unjust Wars.M. Walzer - 1979 - Philosophy 54 (209):415-420.
The ethics of killing in war.Jeff McMahan - 2004 - Ethics 114 (4):693-733.
The ethics of killing in war.Jeff McMahan - 2006 - Philosophia 34 (1):693-733.
Innocence, self-defense and killing in war.Jeff McMahan - 1994 - Journal of Political Philosophy 2 (3):193–221.

View all 11 references / Add more references