Moral Tragedy Pacifism

Journal of Moral Philosophy 16 (3):259-278 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Conditional pacifism is the view that war is morally justified if and only if it satisfies the condition of not causing serious harm or death to innocent persons. Modern war cannot satisfy this condition, and is thus always unjustified. The main response to this position is that the moral presumption against harming or killing innocents is overridden in certain cases by the moral presumption against allowing innocents to be harmed or killed. That is, as harmful as modern war is, it can be morally justified as a lesser evil when it alone can prevent great harm to innocents. This paper proposes that extreme cases in which only war can prevent great harm to innocents may be morally tragic. In some cases it may be both wrong to wage war to prevent great harm and wrong to fail to prevent that great harm.


Added to PP

610 (#31,527)

6 months
297 (#8,993)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Nicholas Parkin
Peace Experiment

Citations of this work

J├╝rgen Habermas: A Political Pacifist?Michael Haiden - 2024 - Res Philosophica 101 (2):191-217.
The Morality of Militarization. [REVIEW]Nicholas Parkin - 2020 - International Studies Review 23 (2):434-435.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Ethical Consistency.B. A. O. Williams & W. F. Atkinson - 1965 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 39 (1):103-138.
Moral dilemmas and consistency.Ruth Barcan Marcus - 1980 - Journal of Philosophy 77 (3):121-136.
Moral dilemmas.E. J. Lemmon - 1962 - Philosophical Review 71 (2):139-158.
War and Massacre.Thomas Nagel - 1985 - In Lawrence A. Alexander (ed.), International Ethics: A Philosophy and Public Affairs Reader. Princeton University Press. pp. 53-75.
Introduction. The Debate on Moral Dilemmas.Christopher Gowans - 1987 - In Christopher W. Gowans (ed.), Moral dilemmas. New York: Oxford Uiversity Press. pp. 3--33.

View all 9 references / Add more references