Juridical proof and the best explanation

&
Law and Philosophy 27 (3):223 - 268 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1007/s10982-007-9016-4

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Artificial intelligence and the evidentiary process: The challenges of formalism and computation. [REVIEW]Ronald J. Allen - 2001 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 9 (2-3):99-114.
.[author unknown] - unknown
Can science explain mysticism?Evan Fales - 1999 - Religious Studies 35 (2):213-227.
The problematic value of mathematical models of evidence.Ronald J. Allen & Michael S. Pardo - 2007
Depth: An Account of Scientific Explanation.Michael Strevens - 2008 - Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
The Limits of Explanation.Richard Swinburne - 1990 - Philosophy 27 (Supplement):177 - 193.
The proof-explanation is logically neutral.B. G. Sundholm - unknown
Explanationism all the way down.Ronald J. Allen - 2008 - Episteme 5 (3):pp. 320-328.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
106 (#162,380)

6 months
24 (#113,849)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Varieties of Risk.Philip A. Ebert, Martin Smith & Ian Durbach - 2020 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 101 (2):432-455.
Knowledge, Individualised Evidence and Luck.Dario Mortini - 2022 - Philosophical Studies 179 (12):3791-3815.

View all 30 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

The best explanation: Criteria for theory choice.Paul R. Thagard - 1978 - Journal of Philosophy 75 (2):76-92.

Add more references