Further Reflections on the Argument from Reason

Philo 3 (1):90-102 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this essay I respond to the critical remarks made by Prof. Reppert in “Reply to Parsons and Lippard on the Argument from Reason” (present issue). I also provide a critique of Reppert’s original article, “The Argument from Reason,” in Philo vol. 2, no. 1 (Spring-Summer 1999).

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Argument from Reason.Victor Reppert - 1999 - Philo 2 (1):33-45.
Transformations of the concept of reason.Herbert Schnadelbach - 1998 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 1 (1):3-14.
When seeing is not believing: A critique of Priest's argument from perception.Paul Kabay - 2006 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 84 (3):443 – 460.
Morality as a rational requirement.Julian Baggini - 2002 - Philosophy 77 (3):447-453.
Feeling pain for the very first time: The normative knowledge argument.Guy Kahane - 2009 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 80 (1):20-49.
Believing For a Reason.John Turri - 2011 - Erkenntnis 74 (3):383-397.
Is Hume a Sceptic with Regard to Reason?Fred Wilson - 1984 - Philosophy Research Archives 10:275-319.
Brewer’s switching argument.Andre Abath - 2012 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 85 (1):255-277.
Reason over passion: the social basis of evaluation and appraisal.Evan Simpson - 1979 - Waterloo, Ont.: Wilfrid Laurier University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-09

Downloads
68 (#231,141)

6 months
7 (#350,235)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Anti-Naturalistic Arguments From Reason.Graham Oppy - 2022 - Roczniki Filozoficzne 70 (1):15-35.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references