False Precision, Surprise and Improved Uncertainty Assessment

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A 373 (2055):20140453 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

An uncertainty report describes the extent of an agent’s uncertainty about some matter. We identify two basic requirements for uncertainty reports, which we call faithfulness and completeness. We then discuss two pitfalls of uncertainty assessment that often result in reports that fail to meet these requirements. The first involves adopting a one-size-fits-all approach to the representation of uncertainty, while the second involves failing to take account of the risk of surprises. In connection with the latter, we respond to the objection that it is impossible to account for the risk of genuine surprises. After outlining some steps that both scientists and the bodies who commission uncertainty assessments can take to help avoid these pitfalls, we explain why striving for faithfulness and completeness is important.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,795

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Uncertainty in risk assessment : contents and modes of communication.Rikard Levin - 2005 - Dissertation, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm
Economic (ir)rationality in risk analysis.Sven Ove Hansson - 2006 - Economics and Philosophy 22 (2):231-241.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-07-12

Downloads
40 (#567,814)

6 months
6 (#891,985)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Wendy Parker
Virginia Tech