Explanatory Failures of Relative Realism

Epistemologia 38 (1):16-28 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Scientific realism (Putnam 1975; Psillos 1999) and relative realism (Mizrahi 2013) claim that successful scientific theories are approximately true and comparatively true, respectively. A theory is approximately true if and only if it is close to the truth. A theory is comparatively true if and only if it is closer to the truth than its competitors are. I argue that relative realism is more skeptical about the claims of science than it initially appears to be and that it can explain neither the success nor the failure of science. Hence, it is not a promising competitor to scientific realism.

Similar books and articles

The Argument from Underconsideration and Relative Realism.Moti Mizrahi - 2013 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 27 (4):393-407.
Realism, Anti-Realism, and the Success of Science.David Marcus Shein - 2002 - Dissertation, City University of New York
Realism Versus Surrealism.Seungbae Park - 2016 - Foundations of Science 21 (4):603-614.
answering Some Objections To Scientific Realism.S. Hood - 2002 - Florida Philosophical Review 2 (2):73-83.
Why the ultimate argument for scientific realism ultimately fails.Moti Mizrahi - 2012 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 43 (1):132-138.
Modest Realism.William Newton-Smith - 1988 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1988:179 - 189.
From Standard Scientific Realism and Structural Realism to Best Current Theory Realism.Gerald D. Doppelt - 2011 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 42 (2):295-316.
Realism: Metaphysical, Scientific, and Semantic.Panu Raatikainen - 2014 - In Kenneth R. Westphal (ed.), Realism, Science, and Pragmatism. Routledge. pp. 139-158.
The Promise of Science: Scientific Realism Without Convergence.Edmond Mark Mulaire - 1996 - Dissertation, University of California, San Diego
The Historical Objection to Scientific Realism.Jarrett Leplin - 1982 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1982:88 - 97.
Does Scientific Realism Matter?Carl Alan Matheson - 1986 - Dissertation, Syracuse University
Scientific Realism.Bruce Reichenbach - 2010 - In Melville Y. Stewart (ed.), Science and Religion in Dialogue. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 1011--1033.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-05-28

Downloads
512 (#32,785)

6 months
78 (#49,055)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Seungbae Park
Ulsan National Institute Of Science And Technology

Citations of this work

Critiques of Minimal Realism.Seungbae Park - 2017 - Problemos 92:102-114.
Editorial.[author unknown] - 2017 - Editorial 9 (44):1-4.
Editorial.[author unknown] - 2017 - Disputatio 9 (44):1-4.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The scientific image.C. Van Fraassen Bas - 1980 - New York: Oxford University Press.
The Scientific Image.William Demopoulos & Bas C. van Fraassen - 1982 - Philosophical Review 91 (4):603.
Explaining the Success of a Scientific Theory.Timothy D. Lyons - 2003 - Philosophy of Science 70 (5):891-901.
Realism Versus Surrealism.Seungbae Park - 2016 - Foundations of Science 21 (4):603-614.

View all 8 references / Add more references