Can the Bundle Theory Save Substantivalism from the Hole Argument?

Philosophy of Science 68 (S3):S358-S370 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

One of the most serious theoretical obstacles to contemporary spacetime substantivalism is Earman and Norton's hole argument. We argue that applying the bundle theory of substance to spacetime points allows spacetime substantivalists to escape the conclusion of this argument. Some philosophers have claimed that the bundle theory cannot be applied to substantival spacetime in this way due to problems in individuating spacetime points in symmetrical spacetimes. We demonstrate that it is possible to overcome these difficulties if spatiotemporal properties are viewed as tropes rather than universals.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Hole Argument.John D. Norton - 1988 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1988:56 - 64.
The Bundle Theory, Substance and Spacetime.Glenn Gerard Parsons - 2001 - Dissertation, University of Alberta (Canada)
The Case for Substantivalism.Carolyn Jane Brighouse - 1996 - Dissertation, University of Southern California
Einstein algebras and the hole argument.Jonathan Bain - 2003 - Philosophy of Science 70 (5):1073-1085.
Determinism and modality.Carolyn Brighouse - 1997 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48 (4):465-481.
O tzw. argumencie dziury.Jerzy Gołosz - 2000 - Filozofia Nauki 1:35 - 72.
What price spacetime substantivalism? The hole story.John Earman & John Norton - 1987 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 38 (4):515-525.
Albert Einstein Meets David Lewis.Jeremy Butterfield - 1988 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1988:65-81.
Regarding the ‘Hole Argument’.James Owen Weatherall - 2016 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science:axw012.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
148 (#122,462)

6 months
17 (#132,430)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Glenn Parsons
Toronto Metropolitan University
Patrick McGivern
University of Wollongong
Patrick McGivern
University of Wollongong

Citations of this work

The bare necessities.Shamik Dasgupta - 2011 - Philosophical Perspectives 25 (1):115-160.
Physical Geometry.James P. Binkoski - 2016 - Dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst

Add more citations

References found in this work

What price spacetime substantivalism? The hole story.John Earman & John Norton - 1987 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 38 (4):515-525.
Human Knowledge, Its Scope and Limits.Bertrand Russell - 1949 - Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 54 (2):198-199.
Substances and space-time: What Aristotle would have said to Einstein.Tim Maudlin - 1990 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 21 (4):531-561.

View all 15 references / Add more references