Sign Systems Studies 42 (2/3):193-218 (2014)
Abstract |
In the context of the relationship between signs and concepts, this paper tackles some of the ongoing controversies over conceptual development and change – including the claim by some that concepts are not open to revision at all – taking the position that concepts pull apart from language and that concepts can be discussed on at least four levels: that of individual agent, community, society, and language. More controversially, it claims that concepts are not just inherently open to revision but that they, and the frameworks of which they form part, are in a state of continuous, if generally incremental, change: a position that derives directly from the enactive tradition in philosophy. Concepts, to be effective as concepts, must strike a careful balance between being stable enough to apply across suitably many contexts and flexible enough to adapt to each new context. The paper’s contribution is a comparison and contrast of conceptual development and change on four time scales: that of the day-to-day life of an individual conceptual agent, the day-to-day life of society, the lifetime of an individual agent, and the lifetime of society and the human species itself. It concludes that the relationship between concepts and experience is one of circular and not linear causality.
|
Keywords | Contemporary Philosophy Language and Literature Semiotics |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
ISBN(s) | 1406-4243 |
DOI | 10.12697/sss.2014.42.2-3.03 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas Samuel Kuhn - 1962 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience.Francisco J. Varela, Evan Thompson & Eleanor Rosch - 1991 - MIT Press.
View all 43 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
On the Essentially Dynamic Nature of Concepts: Constant If Incremental Motion in Conceptual Spaces.Joel Parthemore - 2019 - In Peter Gärdenfors, Antti Hautamäki, Frank Zenker & Mauri Kaipainen (eds.), Conceptual Spaces: Elaborations and Applications. Springer Verlag.
The Importance of Natural Hand Interaction in Virtual Reality : Will Memorization Ability Increase with Higher Sense of Ownership in VR?Julia Rosén, Kai Hübner & Christian Balkenius - 2017 - In Anders Arwestöm Jansson, Anton Axelsson, Rebecca Andreasson & Erik Billing (eds.), Proceedings of the 13th SweCog Conference. pp. 60-62.
Similar books and articles
An IRT Analysis of Motive Questionnaires: The Unified Motive Scales.Felix D. Schönbrodt & Friederike X. R. Gerstenberg - unknown
Graceful Degradation and Conceptual Development.Frank Keil - 2011 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (3):133-134.
Orchestration of Network Instruments: A Way to de-Emphasize the Partition Between Incremental Change and Innovation? [REVIEW]Trond Haga - 2009 - AI and Society 23 (1):17-31.
Sign Evolution on Multiple Time Scales. Introductory Comments.Kristian Tylen & Luis Emilio Bruni - 2014 - Sign Systems Studies 42 (2/3):169-171.
El desarrollo tecnológico en la historia.Leonardo Ordoñez - 2007 - Areté. Revista de Filosofía 19 (2):187-209.
Conceptual Change in Biology: Scientific and Philosophical Perspectives on Evolution and Development.Alan C. Love (ed.) - 2015 - Berlin: Springer Verlag, Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science.
Is It Time for an Updated ‘Eco-Evo-Devo’ Definition of Evolution by Natural Selection?Marion Blute - 2008 - Spontaneous Generations 2 (1):1.
Policymaking Under Pressure: The Perils of Incremental Responses to Climate Change.Cary Coglianese & Jocelyn D'Ambrosio - manuscript
The Sigma Profile: A Formal Tool to Study Organization and its Evolution at Multiple Scales.Carlos Gershenson - 2011 - Complexity 16 (5):37-44.
Theory Change as Dimensional Change: Conceptual Spaces Applied to the Dynamics of Empirical Theories.Peter Gärdenfors & Frank Zenker - 2013 - Synthese 190 (6):1039-1058.
A Mechanism and its Metaphysics: An Evolutionary Account of the Social and Conceptual Development of Science. [REVIEW]David L. Hull - 1988 - Biology and Philosophy 3 (2):123-155.
The Evolution of Cultural Entities.Michael Wheeler, John M. Ziman & Margaret A. Boden (eds.) - 2002 - Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Emergence, Evolution, and the Geometry of Logic: Causal Leaps and the Myth of Historical Development. [REVIEW]Stephen Palmquist - 2007 - Foundations of Science 12 (1):9-37.
Learning About Biological Evolution: A Special Case of Intentional Conceptual Change.S. A. Southerland & G. M. Sinatra - 2003 - In Gale M. Sinatra & Paul R. Pintrich (eds.), Intentional Conceptual Change. L. Erlbaum. pp. 317--345.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2015-09-04
Total views
15 ( #694,353 of 2,498,159 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #427,476 of 2,498,159 )
2015-09-04
Total views
15 ( #694,353 of 2,498,159 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #427,476 of 2,498,159 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads