Sign Systems Studies 42 (2/3):193-218 (2014)

Abstract
In the context of the relationship between signs and concepts, this paper tackles some of the ongoing controversies over conceptual development and change – including the claim by some that concepts are not open to revision at all – taking the position that concepts pull apart from language and that concepts can be discussed on at least four levels: that of individual agent, community, society, and language. More controversially, it claims that concepts are not just inherently open to revision but that they, and the frameworks of which they form part, are in a state of continuous, if generally incremental, change: a position that derives directly from the enactive tradition in philosophy. Concepts, to be effective as concepts, must strike a careful balance between being stable enough to apply across suitably many contexts and flexible enough to adapt to each new context. The paper’s contribution is a comparison and contrast of conceptual development and change on four time scales: that of the day-to-day life of an individual conceptual agent, the day-to-day life of society, the lifetime of an individual agent, and the lifetime of society and the human species itself. It concludes that the relationship between concepts and experience is one of circular and not linear causality.
Keywords Contemporary Philosophy  Language and Literature  Semiotics
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 1406-4243
DOI 10.12697/sss.2014.42.2-3.03
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 68,944
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas S. Kuhn - 1962 - University of Chicago Press.
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas Samuel Kuhn - 1962 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
The Language of Thought.Jerry A. Fodor - 1975 - Harvard University Press.

View all 43 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Graceful Degradation and Conceptual Development.Frank Keil - 2011 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (3):133-134.
El desarrollo tecnológico en la historia.Leonardo Ordoñez - 2007 - Areté. Revista de Filosofía 19 (2):187-209.
Conceptual Change in Biology: Scientific and Philosophical Perspectives on Evolution and Development.Alan C. Love (ed.) - 2015 - Berlin: Springer Verlag, Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science.
The Evolution of Cultural Entities.Michael Wheeler, John M. Ziman & Margaret A. Boden (eds.) - 2002 - Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2015-09-04

Total views
15 ( #694,353 of 2,498,159 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #427,476 of 2,498,159 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes