Towards Identifying an Upper Limit of Risk: A Persistent Area of Controversy in Research Ethics

Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 63 (2):327-345 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A core tenet of research ethics is that risks assumed by research participants are reasonable, balanced, and minimized in relation to benefit to the individual and to society. It is also generally accepted that people who cannot give their own informed consent ought only to be exposed to low risks in research, unless there is a compensating potential for direct benefit.However, there is no consensus on whether individuals should be able to voluntarily consent to high net risk in research—or, in other words, to research that is not justified by direct benefits to the individual and must be justified by benefits to others in society. The Belmont Report—perhaps the most canonical document in research ethics—does not...

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Limits to research risks.F. G. Miller & S. Jofe - 2009 - Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (7):445-449.
Can informed consent to research be adapted to risk?Danielle Bromwich & Annette Rid - 2015 - Journal of Medical Ethics 41 (7):521-528.
The concept of risk and responsible conduct of research.Eugenijus Gefenas - 2006 - Science and Engineering Ethics 12 (1):75-83.
The Merits of Procedure-Level Risk-Benefit Assessment.Anna Westra & Inez de Beaufort - 2011 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 33 (5):7-13.
The Right to Participate in High-Risk Research.David Shaw - 2014 - The Lancet 38:1009 – 1011.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-08-07

Downloads
26 (#577,276)

6 months
11 (#196,102)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

A few remarks on limits of research risks and research payments.Joanna Różyńska - 2023 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 26 (1):155-156.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references