- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Pediatric Decision Making Requires Both Guidance and Intervention Principles
American Journal of Bioethics 18 (8):44-46 (2018)
Abstract
In “The Harm Principle Cannot Replace the Best Interest Standard: Problems With Using the Harm Principle for Medical Decision Making for Children,” Bester argues that conceptual and normative diffi...Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
The Best Interest Standard: Same Name but Different Roles in Pediatric Bioethics and Child Rights Frameworks.Lainie Friedman Ross & Alissa Hurwitz Swota - 2017 - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 60 (2):186-197.
Ethics Consultation in Pediatrics: Long-Term Experience From a Pediatric Oncology Center.Liza-Marie Johnson, Christopher L. Church, Monika Metzger & Justin N. Baker - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics 15 (5):3-17.
Predictive Genetic Testing of Children and the Role of the Best Interest Standard: Currents in Contemporary Bioethics.Lainie Friedman Ross - 2013 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 41 (4):899-906.
Adolescent Pediatric Decision-Making: A Critical Reconsideration in the Light of the Data.Brian Partridge - 2014 - HEC Forum 26 (4):299-308.
Contextualizing Pediatric Decision Making Within an Ethics of Families.Sabrina F. Derrington & Erin D. Paquette - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics 18 (3):26-28.
A Life Below the Threshold? Examining Conflict Between Ethical Principles and Parental Values In Neonatal Treatment Decision Making.Thomas V. Cunningham - 2016 - Narrative Inquiry in Bioethics 6 (1).
Rules and Principles in Moral Decision Making: An Empirical Objection to Moral Particularism.Jennifer L. Zamzow - 2015 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 18 (1):123-134.
Optimisation and “Thoughtful Conjecturing” as Principles of Analytical Guidance in Social Decision Making.Sergio Bruno - 2010 - In Marisa Faggini, Concetto Paolo Vinci, Antonio Abatemarco, Rossella Aiello, F. T. Arecchi, Lucio Biggiero, Giovanna Bimonte, Sergio Bruno, Carl Chiarella, Maria Pia Di Gregorio, Giacomo Di Tollo, Simone Giansante, Jaime Gil Aluja, A. I͡U Khrennikov, Marianna Lyra, Riccardo Meucci, Guglielmo Monaco, Giancarlo Nota, Serena Sordi, Pietro Terna, Kumaraswamy Velupillai & Alessandro Vercelli (eds.), Decision Theory and Choices: A Complexity Approach. Springer Verlag Italia. pp. 37--63.
The Ethics of Vaccination Nudges in Pediatric Practice.Mark C. Navin - 2017 - HEC Forum 29 (1):43-57.
Should Neuroscience Inform Judgements of Decision-Making Capacity?Andrew Peterson - 2018 - Neuroethics 12 (2):133-151.
The moral status of the newborn and its implications for medical decision making.Lainie Friedman Ross - 2007 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 28 (5):349-355.
How do clinicians prepare family members for the role of surrogate decision-maker?Thomas V. Cunningham, Leslie P. Scheunemann, Robert M. Arnold & Douglas White - 2017 - Journal of Medical Ethics Recent Issues 44 (1):21-26.
Resisting the Siren Call of Individualism in Pediatric Decision-Making and the Role of Relational Interests.E. K. Salter - 2014 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 39 (1):26-40.
How do clinicians prepare family members for the role of surrogate decision-maker?V. Cunningham Thomas, P. Scheunemann Leslie, M. Arnold Robert & White Douglas - 2018 - Journal of Medical Ethics 44 (1):21-26.
On cross-cultural conflict and pediatric intervention.Sumner B. Twiss - 2006 - Journal of Religious Ethics 34 (1):163-175.
Analytics
Added to PP
2018-08-24
Downloads
15 (#926,042)
6 months
4 (#800,606)
2018-08-24
Downloads
15 (#926,042)
6 months
4 (#800,606)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Rumors of the Best Interest Standard’s Demise Have Been Greatly Exaggerated, and the Harm Principle Remains Tenuous: Responding to My Commentators.Johan Christiaan Bester - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics 18 (8):W1-W5.
References found in this work
Principles of biomedical ethics.Tom L. Beauchamp - 1994 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by James F. Childress.
Principles of Biomedical Ethics.Ezekiel J. Emanuel, Tom L. Beauchamp & James F. Childress - 1995 - Hastings Center Report 25 (4):37.
Deciding for Others: The Ethics of Surrogate Decision Making.Allen E. Buchanan & Dan W. Brock - 1989 - New York: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Dan W. Brock.
Parental refusals of medical treatment: The harm principle as threshold for state intervention.Douglas Diekema - 2004 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 25 (4):243-264.
The Harm Principle Cannot Replace the Best Interest Standard: Problems With Using the Harm Principle for Medical Decision Making for Children.Johan Christiaan Bester - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics 18 (8):9-19.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-7c76586df8-hc2g5 uwo