- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Beyond the Apnea Test: An Argument to Broaden the Requirement for Consent to the Entire Brain Death Evaluation
American Journal of Bioethics 20 (6):17-19 (2020)
Abstract
Volume 20, Issue 6, June 2020, Page 17-19.Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
The Apnea Test: Requiring Consent for a Test That is a Self-Fulfilling Prophecy, Not Fit for Purpose, and Always Confounded?Ari R. Joffe - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (6):42-44.
The Case Against Solicitation of Consent for Apnea Testing.Dhristie Bhagat & Ariane Lewis - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (6):20-22.
Apnea Testing is Medical Treatment Requiring Informed Consent.Greg Yanke, Mohamed Y. Rady, Joseph Verheijde & Joan McGregor - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (6):22-24.
Informed Consent for Apnea Testing: Meeting the Standard of Care.Brian Michael Jackson - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (6):49-51.
Accommodating Apnea Testing Not Death Determination Refusal.Christos Lazaridis - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (6):47-49.
Informed Consent Should Not Be Required for Apnea Testing and Arguing It Should Misses the Point.Armand H. Matheny Antommaria, William Sveen & Erika L. Stalets - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (6):25-27.
Requiring Consent for Brain-Death Testing: A Perilous Proposal.Joseph Bertino & Jordan Potter - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (6):28-30.
Can’t Hit Pause? On the Constitutive Elements of Responsible Ventilator Management & the Apnea Test.Kevin M. Dirksen & Lilith Judd - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (6):35-37.
Restoring Trust and Requiring Consent in Death by Neurological Criteria.L. Syd M. Johnson - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (6):33-35.
Brain Death Testing: Time for National Uniformity.Thaddeus Mason Pope - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (6):1-3.
Analytics
Added to PP
2020-05-23
Downloads
26 (#706,704)
6 months
15 (#313,189)
2020-05-23
Downloads
26 (#706,704)
6 months
15 (#313,189)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Statement in Support of Revising the Uniform Determination of Death Act and in Opposition to a Proposed Revision.D. Alan Shewmon - 2021 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 48 (5):453-477.
Brain Death Testing: Time for National Uniformity.Thaddeus Mason Pope - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (6):1-3.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries “Rethinking the Ethical, Legal, and Clinical Foundations of Informed Consent and Shared Decision-Making for Brain Death Determination”.Jeremy R. Garrett & Ivor Berkowitz - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (6):W1-W5.
References found in this work
Principles of Biomedical Ethics: Marking Its Fortieth Anniversary.James Childress & Tom Beauchamp - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (11):9-12.
Legal and Ethical Considerations for Requiring Consent for Apnea Testing in Brain Death Determination.Ivor Berkowitz & Jeremy R. Garrett - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (6):4-16.
Rethinking Brain Death as a Legal Fiction: Is the Terminology the Problem?.Seema K. Shah - 2018 - Hastings Center Report 48 (S4):49-52.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-9b866bbb8-nm99f uwo