The limits of logical empiricism: selected papers of Arthur Pap

Dordrecht: Springer. Edited by Alfons Keupink & Sanford Shieh (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Arthur Pap’s work played an important role in the development of the analytic tradition. This role goes beyond the merely historical fact that Pap’s views of dispositional and modal concepts were influential. As a sympathetic critic of logical empiricism, Pap, like Quine, saw a deep tension in logical empiricism at its very best in the work of Carnap. But Pap’s critique of Carnap is quite different from Quine’s, and represents the discovery of limits beyond which empiricism cannot go, where there lies nothing other than intuitive knowledge of logic itself. Pap’s arguments for this intuitive knowledge anticipate Etchemendy’s recent critique of the model-theoretic account of logical consequence. Pap’s work also anticipates prominent developments in the contemporary neo-Fregean philosophy of mathematics championed by Wright and Hale. Finally, Pap’s major philosophical preoccupation, the concepts of necessity and possibility, provides distinctive solutions and perspectives on issues of contemporary concern in the metaphysics of modality. In particular, Pap’s account of modality allows us to see the significance of Kripke’s well-known arguments on necessity and apriority in a new light.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,347

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Reply to “arthur Pap on meaning rules”.Arthur Pap - 1960 - Philosophical Studies 11 (3):38 - 41.
A critique of Frankfurt-libertarianism.Kevin Timpe - 2006 - Philosophia 34 (2):189-202.
The explanatory value of the unconscious.Michael Martin - 1964 - Philosophy of Science 31 (April):122-132.
Synonymity and Logical Equivalence.Arthur Pap - 1948 - Analysis 9 (4):51 - 57.
Logical nonsense.Arthur Pap - 1948 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 9 (2):269-283.
Nominalism, empiricism and universals--I.Arthur Pap - 1959 - Philosophical Quarterly 9 (37):330-340.
Nominalism, empiricism and Universals--II.Arthur Pap - 1960 - Philosophical Quarterly 10 (38):44-60.
Logical positivism and the mind-body problem.Jaegwon Kim - 2003 - In Paolo Parrini, Wes Salmon & Merrilee Salmon (eds.), Logical Empiricism: Historical & Contemporary Perspectives. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Red and green all over again: A rejoinder to Arthur Pap.Hilary Putnam - 1957 - Philosophical Review 66 (January):100-103.


Added to PP

123 (#148,034)

6 months
23 (#121,543)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The Kantian Elements in Arthur Pap’s Philosophy.David J. Stump - 2021 - Journal of Transcendental Philosophy 21 (1):71-83.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Two Dogmas of Empiricism.W. Quine - 1951 - [Longmans, Green].
From a Logical Point of View.Willard Van Orman Quine - 1953 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Naming and necessity.Saul A. Kripke - 2010 - In Darragh Byrne & Max Kölbel (eds.), Arguing about language. New York: Routledge. pp. 431-433.

View all 246 references / Add more references