Social Shutdowns as an Extraordinary Means of Saving Human Life

The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 20 (3):545-559 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The effects of the novel coronavirus have raised questions about the extent to which social shutdowns are appropriate. We have a responsibility to protect the lives of others and an obligation to maintain our lives and health when possible, but there are circumstances when it is just to decline certain measures that are considered extraordinary to the situation. Measures taken to protect life must be proportionate. That is, they must offer a reasonable hope of benefit and not impose excessive burdens on individuals, families, or the community. The measures enacted during the COVID-19 pandemic are not proportionate. Restrictions on family and religious activities are disproportionate to the benefit they provide, particularly to the extent that they obstruct the Church in its duty to tend to the health of souls and salvation of its members

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,122

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

If Food and Water Are Proportionate Means, Why Not Oxygen?John Skalko - 2013 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 13 (3):453-467.
Should Every Human Being Get Health Care?Göran Collste - 1999 - Ethical Perspectives 6 (2):115-125.
Families, Dependencies, and the Moral Ground of Health Savings Accounts.J. P. Bishop - 2012 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 37 (6):513-525.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-12-30

Downloads
6 (#1,353,689)

6 months
1 (#1,346,405)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references