Ethicality and confidentiality: is there an inverse-care issue in general practice ethics?

Clinical Ethics 6 (4):186-190 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper discusses confidentiality as a routine issue of concern to British general practitioners participating in a qualitative study as well as in contemporaneous practice literature. While keen to reflect on routine issues, such as confidentiality, participants who professed a lack of expertise in medical ethics also perceived reluctance or inability to access educational resources or ethics support. Such lack of ability might include a perception of non-entitlement to access advice and support, a fear of criticism, or simply that resources fail to be advertised. Participants' insights are set alongside a concurrent debate in the professional literature over whether problems with maintaining confidentiality should be rigorously discussed in a public forum. A preliminary suggestion is that confidentiality may be emblematic of the negotiation between academic and professional ethics

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,726

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Confidentiality and the law.T. McConnell - 1994 - Journal of Medical Ethics 20 (1):47-49.
Confidentiality revisited.Ke Yu - 2008 - Journal of Academic Ethics 6 (2):161-172.
Ethics Desk Reference for Counselors.Jeffrey E. Barnett - 2009 - Alexandria, Virginia: American Counseling Association. Edited by W. Brad Johnson.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-12-06

Downloads
37 (#429,711)

6 months
3 (#1,253,878)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?