An epistemological framework to appreciate the limits of predatory publishing

Science and Philosophy 10 (1):7-19 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The concept of “predatory” publishing, despite many studies of the phenomenon, continues to be unclear. This paper visualizes this topic through an epistemological perspective, claiming that these limitations emerge from an impressionism of idealization, the entrapment of cause and effect induced by a journalology-based perspective, and entrenched fantasized extraction, imagination and divination of what constitutes the truth, in essence, a path never followed by an _epistēmōn_. Reality, proof, verification, recorded observations and their interpretations have been pivoted to fit the theoretical flavor of the day, an entity one day being predatory, the next not. Perhaps ephemeral judgements of predatory have been built on boundless disregard for common sense. Yet, these have led to scientists’ apotheosis, almost oblivious of the intangibility of “valid”, or the infinitesimal continuum of “predatory”. Perhaps their fault-ridden authoritarian argumentative disabilities is at fault.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The false academy: predatory publishing in science and bioethics.Stefan Eriksson & Gert Helgesson - 2017 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 20 (2):163-170.
The Ethics of Predatory Journals.Alexander McLeod, Arline Savage & Mark G. Simkin - 2018 - Journal of Business Ethics 153 (1):121-131.
Open access, research communities, and a defense against predatory journals.Jeffrey Beall - 2021 - Central Asian Journal of Medical Hypotheses and Ethics 2 (1):14-17.
Is intentional publishing in predatory journals a form of scientific misconduct?C. Stein - 2020 - South African Journal of Bioethics and Law 13 (1):57.
Predatory Conferences: What Are the Signs?Diane Pecorari - 2021 - Journal of Academic Ethics 19 (3):343-361.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-08-26

Downloads
12 (#1,054,764)

6 months
7 (#425,192)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references