Theological appropriation of scientific understandings: Response to Hefner, Wicken, Eaves, and Tipler

Zygon 24 (2):255-271 (1989)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

. Philip Hefner's focus on contingency and field as the guiding concepts in my thinking and his characterization of my theological enterprise as a Lakatosian research program are appropriate and helpful.I welcome Jeffrey Wicken's holistic approach to the emergence of life. Theology can appropriate the language of self‐organizing systems exploiting the thermodynamic flow of energy degradation for interpreting organic life as a creation of the Spirit of God.However, I cannot sympathize with Lindon Eaves's equation of “hard science” with a reductionism which raises the double helix to the status of icon; the “meaning” of DNA derives from its place in the total phenomenon of life—not the reverse.Frank Tipler's cosmology raises the prospect of a rapprochement between physics and theology in the area of eschatology. A Christian cosmology, however, would require at least three modifications: contingency in the history of creation; the uniqueness of Jesus' resurrection; and the relation of these to the problem of evil

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,122

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Response to Clayton.Walter B. Gulick - 2002 - Tradition and Discovery 29 (3):32-47.
Ultimate Explanations: Comments on Tipler.Lawrence Sklar - 1988 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1988:49 - 55.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-02

Downloads
42 (#346,790)

6 months
3 (#643,273)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?