Religious Consciousness and the Realisation of the True Self

Bradley Studies 5 (2):139-161 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In What Religion Is the British Idealist philosopher Bernard Bosanquet inquires into the essence of religion apprehended as a central human experience which is associated with the dialectical process of the human being’s self-realising endeavour. Bosanquet’s views on religion belong to the second phase of the philosophy of religion of the British Idealists which is characterised by a stronger sense of immanentism. The purpose of this article is, first, to show how Bosanquet’s analysis is based on a conceptual framework which contains notional patterns drawn from a set of normative principles that is derived from his metaphysics. Secondly, the article reconstructs and assesses his views on the meaning and importance of religion and religious consciousness for the human being’s spiritual battle to achieve a state of self-realisation and affirm the spirit that characterises the true content of human nature. Thirdly, the article focuses on the elaboration and crystallisation of the fundamental structural components of Bosanquet’s theory of religion that constitute the conceptual framework of his philosophical project. Throughout, I emphasise that Bosanquet’s analysis of religion is an integral part of his moral and social ontology, the inmost essence of which is the concept of good as the only real and final end of the human being’s struggle for the realisation of the true or real self. It is my contention that Bosanquet defends from the idealistic standpoint a theory of religion that reveals in an original way the essence of religious consciousness in its relation to the meaning of the finite individual’s life. The comprehensive understanding of Bosanquet’s position in What Religion Is presupposes, however, prior knowledge of the basic concepts of his metaphysics. The strength of Bosanquet’s theory of religion derives from: its metaphysical foundation; and its implications for the individual’s ethical and social life. Its contribution to the philosophy of religion lies in the fact that it offers a viable alternative theory to the foundationalist-evidentialist view of religious faith.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

8. Bosanquet and Religion.T. L. S. Sprigge - 2005 - In William Sweet (ed.), Bernard Bosanquet and the Legacy of British Idealism. University of Toronto Press. pp. 178-206.
What Religion Is.Bernard Bosanquet - 1921 - The Monist 31:160.
What's True about Hume's 'True Religion'?Don Garrett - 2012 - Journal of Scottish Philosophy 10 (2):199-220.
Irony and Argument in Dialogues, XII.Scott Davis - 1991 - Religious Studies 27 (2):239-257.
Can Neurotheology Explain Religion?Dave Vliegenthart - 2011 - Archive for the Psychology of Religion 33 (2):137-171.
The Evolution of Religion.Bernard Bosanquet - 1894 - International Journal of Ethics 5 (4):432.
Philosophy of religion and religious studies in modern-day Russia.T. V. Malevich & K. V. Karpov - 2014 - Studies in East European Thought 66 (3-4):227-244.
Religion As Aesthetics In Georges Santayana’s Views.Tomasz Czernik - 2010 - Studia Philosophica Wratislaviensia 5 (1):117-126.
Irony and argument in dialogues, XII: Scott Davis.Scott Davis - 1991 - Religious Studies 27 (2):239-257.
The evolution of religion.Bernard Bosanquet - 1895 - International Journal of Ethics 5 (4):432-444.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-09

Downloads
39 (#398,894)

6 months
8 (#342,364)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references