Intentions to consume foods from edible insects and the prospects for transforming the ubiquitous biomass into food

Agriculture and Human Values 35 (4):885-898 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Edible insects are a potentially less burdensome source of proteins on the environment than livestock for a majority of rural consumers. Hence, edible insects are a timely idea to address the challenges of the supply side to sustainably meet an increasing demand for food. The objective of this paper is twofold. The first is to identify and compare rural-households’ intentions to consume insect-based foods among households drawn from two regions in Kenya—one where consumption of insects is common and the other where the practice is uncommon. The second is to explore consumers’ trust in sources of information regarding quality and appropriateness of food items. The study employed an extended theory of planned behaviour and involved 432 participants. Results indicate that rural households have positive intentions to consume insect-based foods and those intentions are higher for individuals who are more familiar with the practice. Results also show that information sources from industry are more trusted than those from the media. Further, the study revealed that control variables such as perceived availability of insect-based foods and their level of fit with the culinary practices have a higher influence on consumption intentions than general attitudes. In addition, age of the respondent, gender, household size and level of formal education, significantly influence the consumption intentions. The study discusses the implications of these findings in the development of sustainable agri-food systems.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Deliberative and pragmatist agriculture.Michiel Korthals - 2017 - Pragmatism Today 8 (2):52-58.
Autonomy, Values, and Food Choice.J. M. Dieterle - 2016 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 29 (3):349-367.
Natural Food and the Pastoral: A Sentimental Notion? [REVIEW]Donald B. Thompson - 2011 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 24 (2):165-194.
Food Labels, Autonomy, and the Right to Know.Matteo Bonotti - 2014 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 24 (4):301-321.
What’s Wrong with Functional Foods?David Kaplan - 2007 - Journal of Philosophical Research 32 (9999):177-187.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-08-23

Downloads
30 (#521,181)

6 months
19 (#130,686)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?