Phase Transitions: A Challenge for Reductionism?

Abstract

In this paper, I analyze the extent to which classical phase transitions, especially continuous phase transitions, impose a challenge for reduction- ism. My main contention is that classical phase transitions are compatible with reduction, at least with the notion of limiting reduction, which re- lates the behavior of physical quantities in different theories under certain limiting conditions. I argue that this conclusion follows even after rec- ognizing the existence of two infinite limits involved in the treatment of continuous phase transitions.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Explaining the emergence of cooperative phenomena.Chuang Liu - 1999 - Philosophy of Science 66 (3):106.
Phase Transitions.Ricard Solé - 2011 - Princeton University Press.
What Is the Paradox of Phase Transitions?Elay Shech - 2013 - Philosophy of Science 80 (5):1170-1181.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-07-18

Downloads
35 (#431,398)

6 months
9 (#242,802)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Patricia Palacios
Ludwig Maximilians Universität, München

Citations of this work

Universality Reduced.Alexander Franklin - 2019 - Philosophy of Science 86 (5):1295-1306.
On the Universality of Hawking Radiation.Sean Gryb, Patricia Palacios & Karim Thebault - 2019 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science:axz025.

Add more citations