Evidence and expertise

Nursing Inquiry 13 (2):82-93 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper evaluates attempts to defend established concepts of expertise and clinical judgement against the incursions of evidence‐based practice. Two related arguments are considered. The first suggests that standard accounts of evidence‐based practice imply an overly narrow view of ‘evidence’, and that a more inclusive concept, incorporating ‘patterns of knowing’ not recognised by the familiar evidence hierarchies, should be adopted. The second suggests that statistical generalisations cannot be applied non‐problematically to individual patients in specific contexts, and points out that this is why we need clinical judgement. In evaluating the first argument, I propose a criterion for what counts as evidence. It is a minimalist criterion but the ‘patterns of knowing’, referred to in the literature, still fail to meet it. In evaluating the second argument, I will outline the powerful empirical reasons we have for thinking that decisions based on research evidence are usually better than decisions based on clinical judgement; and show that current efforts to rehabilitate clinical judgement seriously underestimate the strength of these reasons. By way of conclusion, I will sketch the ways in which the concept of expertise will have to be modified if we accept evidence‐based practice as a template for health‐care.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,088

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Thought experiments, real experiments, and the expertise objection.Christopher Hitchcock - 2012 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 2 (2):205-218.
Moral expertise: Judgment, practice, and analysis*: Julia driver.Julia Driver - 2013 - Social Philosophy and Policy 30 (1-2):280-296.
L’expertise scientifique en société : regards communicationnels.Jean-luc Bouillon - 2012 - Hermès: La Revue Cognition, communication, politique 64 (3):, [ p.].
Articulatory evidence for syllabic structure.K. G. Munhall & J. A. Jones - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (4):524-525.
La fabrique de l’expertise scientifique : contribution des STS.Pierre-benoît Joly - 2012 - Hermès: La Revue Cognition, communication, politique 64 (3):, [ p.].
The possibility of ethical expertise.Bruce D. Weinstein - 1994 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 15 (1):1-187.
The core of expertise.Harry Collins - 2013 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 12 (2):399-416.
Expertise in symbol-referent mapping.Roland H. Grabner - 2009 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (3-4):338-339.
What is an expert?Bruce D. Weinstein - 1993 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 14 (1).
La prise en compte de l’expertise dans les évaluations conduites par l’AERES.Didier Houssin - 2012 - Hermès: La Revue Cognition, communication, politique 64 (3):, [ p.].

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-26

Downloads
10 (#1,055,677)

6 months
2 (#785,137)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

The logic of scientific discovery.Karl Raimund Popper - 1934 - New York: Routledge. Edited by Hutchinson Publishing Group.
Scientific reasoning: the Bayesian approach.Peter Urbach & Colin Howson - 1993 - Chicago: Open Court. Edited by Peter Urbach.

View all 42 references / Add more references