Cognitive Enhancement vs. Plagiarism: a Quantitative Study on the Attitudes of an Italian Sample

Neuroethics 12 (3):279-292 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Irrespective of the presence of formal norms, behaviours such as plagiarism, data fabrication and falsification are commonly regarded as unethical and unfair. Almost unanimously, they are considered forms of academic misconduct. Is this the case also for newer behaviours that technology is making possible and are now entering the academic scenario?

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Electronic media, creativity and plagiarism.Naveed Imran - 2010 - Acm Sigcas Computers and Society 40 (4):25-44.
Integration of cognitive and moral enhancement.Vojin Rakic - 2012 - Filozofija I Društvo 23 (2):91-103.
The Instructional Challenges of Student Plagiarism.Erika Löfström & Pauliina Kupila - 2013 - Journal of Academic Ethics 11 (3):231-242.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-02-28

Downloads
19 (#778,470)

6 months
3 (#992,474)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?