Critical Times 4 (1):48-72 (2021)

Carlos Palacios
Macquarie University
Critical theory has long resisted the notion that an “invisible hand” can operate within the real social dynamics of a free market. But despite the most radical desires of the socially critical imagination, the optimization of that “spontaneous order” or depersonalized way of ordering things known as “the economy” has become the dominant playing field and decisive electoral issue of modern politics. Within this broad contemporary context, Michel Foucault made a strange theoretical intervention that, to this day, continues to baffle readers. During a lecture, he argued that Adam Smith’s invisible hand was, after all, truly and purposively, that is, for technical rather than ideological reasons, “invisible.” This article argues that there is a counter-positivism or tactical irony contained within the logic of such a controversial thesis; namely, that when one acknowledges that the principle of economic competition encourages an efficient self-organizing effect at all times, regardless of context, one is also immediately in a position to appreciate why the art of government should always maintain its political primacy over the spontaneous order of the market.
Keywords neoliberalism  counter-positivism  market  homo economicus  spontaneous order  scarcity  Covid-19
Categories (categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Foucault and the Invisible Economy.Ute Tellmann - 2009 - Foucault Studies 6:5-24.

View all 10 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Is Spontaneous Order a Value-Free Descriptive Methodological Tool?N. Emrah Aydinonat - 2010 - Journal of Economic Methodology 17 (4):448-452.
Foucault and the Invisible Economy.Ute Tellmann - 2009 - Foucault Studies 6:5-24.
God and the Market: Adam Smith’s Invisible Hand. [REVIEW]Paul Oslington - 2012 - Journal of Business Ethics 108 (4):429 - 438.
Adam Smith’s Irony and the Invisible Hand.Sergio Volodia Marcello Cremaschi - 2017 - Iberian Journal of the History of Economic Thought 4 (1):43-62.
God and the Market: Adam Smith’s Invisible Hand.Paul Oslington - 2012 - Journal of Business Ethics 108 (4):429-438.
What’s Wrong with Invisible-Hand Explanations?David L. Hull - 1997 - Philosophy of Science 64 (4):126.
Adam Smith's Invisible Hand Argument.John D. Bishop - 1995 - Journal of Business Ethics 14 (3):165 - 180.
Two Theories of Economic Liberalism.Mark R. Reiff - 2017 - The Adam Smith Review 10:189-214.


Added to PP index

Total views
27 ( #411,049 of 2,461,407 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
23 ( #35,006 of 2,461,407 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes