What Game Is Being Played? The Need for Clarity about the Relationships Between Scientific and Theological Understanding
Zygon 35 (1):141-163 (2000)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)DOI
10.1111/0591-2385.00265
My notes
Similar books and articles
Random Boolean networks and evolutionary game theory.J. McKenzie Alexander - 2003 - Philosophy of Science 70 (5):1289-1304.
Time and eternity: Hymnic, biblical, scientific, and theological views.John R. Albright - 2009 - Zygon 44 (4):989-996.
The role of intuitive ontologies in scientific understanding – the case of human evolution.Helen De Cruz & Johan De Smedt - 2007 - Biology and Philosophy 22 (3):351-368.
Idealizations and scientific understanding.Moti Mizrahi - 2012 - Philosophical Studies 160 (2):237-252.
Fallen Angels or Rising Beasts? Theological Perspectives on Human Uniqueness.Wentzel Van Huyssteen - 2003 - Theology and Science 1 (2):161-178.
How should philosophy be clear? Loaded clarity, default clarity, and Adorno.Nicholas Joll - 2009 - Telos: Critical Theory of the Contemporary 2009 (146):73–95.
Science as a Persuasion Game: An Inferentialist Approach.Jesús Zamora Bonilla - 2006 - Episteme 2 (3):189-201.
Giles’s Game and the Proof Theory of Łukasiewicz Logic.Christian G. Fermüller & George Metcalfe - 2009 - Studia Logica 92 (1):27 - 61.
The referee’s dilemma. The ethics of scientific communities and game theory.Tomislav Bracanovic - 2002 - Prolegomena 1 (1):55-74.
Christian realism for the twenty-first century.Robin W. Lovin - 2009 - Journal of Religious Ethics 37 (4):669-682.
Analytics
Added to PP
2010-09-02
Downloads
32 (#366,892)
6 months
1 (#448,551)
2010-09-02
Downloads
32 (#366,892)
6 months
1 (#448,551)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Theological Shamelessness? A Response to Arthur Peacocke and David A. Pailin.Vítor Westhelle - 2000 - Zygon 35 (1):165-172.
