Third parties belief in a just world and secondary victimization

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36 (1):30-31 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This commentary focuses on how third parties impact the course of acts of revenge based on their world views, such as belief in a just world. Assuming this belief to be true, the following questions could be asked: (a) What are the consequences of a third party's worldview in terms of secondary victimization? (b) Are bystanders actually aware of these consequences? (c) If so, then why do they let it happens?

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Event and Victimization.Dale Spencer - 2011 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 5 (1):39-52.
A Theory of Secondary Qualities.Robert Pasnau - 2007 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 73 (3):568-591.
Projection and realism in Hume's philosophy.P. J. E. Kail - 2007 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Ways Things Can't Be.Greg Restall - 1997 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 38 (4):583-596.
Narcissism, Fundamentalism and Cosmological Ingratitude.Charles W. Harvey - 2008 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 15 (2):41-53.
God and the external world.Martin Smith - 2011 - Ratio 24 (1):65-77.
On the difference it makes.Arthur B. Cody - 1969 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 12 (1-4):394 – 405.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-27

Downloads
20 (#723,940)

6 months
2 (#1,157,335)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Workings of the will.Julius Kuhl & Sander L. Koole - 2004 - In Jeff Greenberg, Sander L. Koole & Tom Pyszczynski (eds.), Handbook of Experimental Existential Psychology. Guilford Press. pp. 411--430.

Add more references