Informative Identities: A Challenge for Frege's Puzzle

Dialectica 70 (4):513-530 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Frege's puzzle about identity sentences has long challenged many philosophers to find a solution to it but also led other philosophers to object that the evidential datum it is grounded on is false. The present work is an elaboration of this second kind of reaction: it explains why Frege's puzzle seems to resist the traditional objection, giving voice to different and more elaborated presentations of the evidential datum, faithful to the spirit but not to the letter of Frege's puzzle. The final outcome is negative, no satisfactory formulation of the evidential datum is found and Frege's puzzle is challenged until a better formulation of it is found.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,140

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Can Frege pose Frege's puzzle?Stavroula Glezakos - 2009 - In Joseph Almog & Paolo Leonardi (eds.), The Philosophy of David Kaplan. Oxford University Press. pp. 202.
Does Semantic Relationism Solve Frege’s Puzzle?Bryan Pickel & Brian Rabern - 2017 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 46 (1):97-118.
Frege's Puzzle for Perception.Boyd Millar - 2016 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 93 (2):368-392.
Troubles with Direct Reference.Pierre Baumann - 2012 - Fenomenologia. Diálogos Possíveis Campinas: Alínea/Goiânia: Editora da Puc Goiás 93:33-51.
Frege’s puzzle and arithmetical formalism. Putting things in context.Sorin Costreie - 2013 - History and Philosophy of Logic 34 (3):207-224.
A pragmatic solution to Ostertag’s puzzle.Philip Atkins - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 163 (2):359-365.
When Fodor Met Frege.Jonathan Berg - 2015 - Erkenntnis 80 (2):467-476.
Berg’s Answer to Frege’s Puzzle.Wayne A. Davis - 2017 - Philosophia 45 (1):19-34.
Frege’s Distinction Between Sense and Reference.Gideon Makin - 2010 - Philosophy Compass 5 (2):147-163.
Searle on proper names.Michael McKinsey - 1971 - Philosophical Review 80 (2):220-229.
Frege’s puzzle.Nathan Salmon - 1986 - Ridgeview.
The Frege puzzle one more time.Martin Hahn - 1995 - In Petr Kotatko & John Biro (eds.), Frege: Sense and Reference One Hundred Years Later. Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 169--183.
Why is Frege's Puzzle Still Puzzling?Eros Corazza & Jerome Dokič - 1995 - In Petr Kotatko & John Biro (eds.), Frege: Sense and Reference One Hundred Years Later. Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 151--168.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-01-20

Downloads
49 (#240,943)

6 months
3 (#224,280)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Elisa Paganini
Università degli Studi di Milano

References found in this work

Naming and Necessity.Saul A. Kripke - 1980 - Philosophy 56 (217):431-433.
Naming and Necessity.Saul A. Kripke - 1985 - Critica 17 (49):69-71.
A puzzle about belief.Saul A. Kripke - 1979 - In A. Margalit (ed.), Meaning and Use. Reidel. pp. 239--83.
Epistemic Modals.Seth Yalcin - 2007 - Mind 116 (464):983-1026.

View all 27 references / Add more references