Fellow citizens and imperial subjects: Conquest and sovereignty in europe's overseas empires

History and Theory 44 (4):28–46 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article traces the association between the European overseas empires and the concept of sovereignty, arguing that, ever since the days of Cicero—if not earlier—Europeans had clung to the idea that there was a close association between a people and the territory it happened to occupy. This made it necessary to think of an “empire” as a unity—an “immense body,” to use Tacitus’s phrase—that would embrace all its subjects under a single sovereign. By the end of the eighteenth century it had become possible, in this way, to speak of “empires of liberty” that would operate for the ultimate benefit of all their “citizens,” freeing them from previous tyrannical rulers and bringing them under the protection of more benign regimes. In such empires sovereignty could only ever be, as it had become in Europe, undivided. The collapse of Europe's “first” empires in the Americas, however, was followed rapidly by Napoleon’s attempt to create a new kind of Empire in Europe. The ultimate, and costly, failure of this project led many, Benjamin Constant among them, to believe that the age of empires was now over and had been replaced by the age of commerce. But what in fact succeeded Napoleon was the modern European state system, which attempted not to replace empire by trade, as Constant had hoped, but to create a new kind of empire, one that sought to minimize domination and settlement, and to make a sharp distinction between imperial ruler and imperial subject. In this kind of empire, sovereignty could only be “divided.” Various kinds of divided rule were thus devised in the nineteenth century. Far, however, from being an improvement on the past, this ultimately resulted in—or at least contributed greatly to—the emergence of the largely fictional and inevitably unstable societies that after the final collapse of the European empires became the new states of the “developing world.”

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 98,353

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Empire and Modern Political Thought.Sankar Muthu (ed.) - 2012 - Cambridge University Press.
Modern empires and nation-states.John Breuilly - 2017 - Thesis Eleven 139 (1):11-29.
Ottoman Concepts of Empire.Einar Wigen - 2013 - Contributions to the History of Concepts 8 (1):44-66.
Global Empires and The Roman Imperium.Brent D. Shaw - 2022 - American Journal of Philology 143 (3):505-534.
The time of empire.Krishan Kumar - 2017 - Thesis Eleven 139 (1):113-128.
Europe.Peter Geiss - 2019 - In Ludger Kühnhardt & Tilman Mayer (eds.), The Bonn Handbook of Globality: Volume 2. Springer Verlag. pp. 1061-1071.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
72 (#242,442)

6 months
9 (#377,511)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references