Bob Corbett's Comments On Peter Singer's Analysis That Leads to Speciesism

Abstract

As we begin our exploration of our relationship with animals, we come face to face with Peter Singer and his insistence that speciesism is a vice. It is important to come to know what he means by speciesism, why he regards it as a moral mistake.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Speciesism and moral status.Peter Singer - 2009 - Metaphilosophy 40 (3-4):567-581.
What is speciesism?Oscar Horta - 2010 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 23 (3):243-266.
Is speciesism opposed to liberationism?Tzachi Zamir - 2006 - Philosophia 34 (4):465-475.
Interview - Peter Singer.Peter Singer - 2008 - The Philosophers' Magazine 40 (40):59-60.
Speciesism as a Moral Heuristic.Stijn Bruers - 2013 - Philosophia 41 (2):489-501.
Regan's Critique of Singer.Peter Singer - 1979 - Analysis 39 (3):118 - 119.
The Origin of Speciesism.Hugh Lafollette & Niall Shanks - 1996 - Philosophy 71 (275):41-.
Speciesism and Reverse Speciesism.Gary Varner - 2011 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 14 (2):171 - 173.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-12-22

Downloads
36 (#419,193)

6 months
1 (#1,444,594)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references