Does Saying so Make It So?: An Examination of John Searle's Doctrine of Assertions and Aberrations

Dissertation, University of Oregon (1973)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The Peikovian Doctrine of the Arbitrary Assertion.Robert L. Campbell - 2008 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 10 (1):85-170.
Consciousness, free action and the brain: Commentary on John Searle's article (with reply from Searle).Benjamin W. Libet - 2001 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 8 (8):59-65.
Características E dificuldades do naturalismo biológico de John Searle.Tárik de Athayde Prata - 2009 - Philósophos - Revista de Filosofia 14 (1):141-173.
John R. Searle: Thinking about the Real World.Jan G. Michel, Dirk Franken & Attila Karakus (eds.) - 2010 - Frankfurt: ontos/de Gruyter.
Consciousness, free action and the brain.John R. Searle - 2000 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 7 (10):3-22.
Problem of «Chinese Room» in the Context of Functionalism Discussing.Dmitry Kazennov - 2010 - Analytica 4:1-15.
Acting on gaps? John Searle's conception of free will.John Searle’S. Conception - 2010 - In Jan G. Michel, Dirk Franken & Attila Karakus (eds.), John R. Searle: Thinking About the Real World. Ontos. pp. 103.
Could a machine think? Alan M. Turing vs. John R. Searle.Günther Mario - unknown
Speech Acts, Attitudes, and Scientific Practice: Can Searle Handle "Assuming for the Sake of Hypothesis?".Daniel J. McKaughan - 2012 - Pragmatics and Cognition 20 (1):88-106.
A Reply to John Searle and Other Traditionalists.Robert Greenleaf Brice - 2008 - Multicultural Education 16 (2):37-40.
The Chinese Rune Argument–Searle's Response.John Searle - 2001 - Philosophical Explorations 4 (2):75-77.
On Some Difficulties Concerning John Searle’s Notion of an ‘Institutional Fact’: Comment to John R. Searle “Social Ontology and the Philosophy of Society” (Analyse & Kritik 20, 149-158). [REVIEW]Carsten Heidemann - 1999 - Analyse & Kritik 21 (2):251-264.
Trivial, Platitudinous, Boring? Searle on Conceptual Relativism.Markus Seidel & Arne Weber - 2010 - In Dirk Franken, Attila Karakus & Jan Michel (eds.), John R. Searle. Thinking About the Real World. Ontos.
Using non-sentences: An application of Relevance Theory.Robert J. Stainton - 1994 - Pragmatics and Cognition 2 (2):269-284.
Response to Searle.David J. Chalmers - 1997 - New York Review of Books 44 (8).

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-06

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references