Alberto Oya
Universidade Nova de Lisboa
The aim of this paper is to analyze Charles S. Peirce’s so-called “Neglected Argument for the Reality of God”. Peirce formulated the Neglected Argument as a “nest” of three different but sequentially developed arguments. Taken as a whole, the Neglected Argument aims to show that engaging in a religious way of life, adoring and acting in accordance with the hypothesis of God, is a subjective, non-evidentially grounded though naturally founded human reaction, and that it is this (alleged) natural foundation that makes it reasonable to accept the hypothesis of God as it being actually true, thereby grounding a properly religious way of life. I argue that Peirce’s Neglected Argument lacks of any serious apologetic force since it fails to justify, on independent, non-question-begging grounds, the claim that we are all naturally (and thus inevitably) lead to formulate, and later adore and act in accordance with, the hypothesis of God.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Should We Want God to Exist?Guy Kahane - 2011 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 82 (3):674-696.
Personal Anti-Theism and the Meaningful Life Argument.Myron A. Penner - 2015 - Faith and Philosophy 32 (3):325-337.
Antitheism and Gratuitous Evil.Ebrahim Azadegan - 2019 - Heythrop Journal 60 (5):671-677.
Peirce on the Hypothesis of God.C. F. Delaney - 1992 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 28 (4):725 - 739.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Peirce's Modal Defense of Infant Baptism.Richard Kenneth Atkins - 2018 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 54 (4):546.
Peircean Faith: Perception, Trust, and Religious Belief in the Conduct of Life.Michael Pope - 2018 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 54 (4):457.
Deductively Valid, Inductively Valid, and Retroductively Valid Syllogisms.Bruce Thompson - 2016 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 52 (4):611.
C.S. Peirce and the Nested Continua Model of Religious Interpretation by Gary Slater.Michael L. Raposa - 2017 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 53 (3):491-495.
Erkenntnis Als Relationengeflecht: Kategorien Bei Charles S. Peirce.Ulrich Baltzer - 1995 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 31 (2):445-453.


Added to PP index

Total views
127 ( #90,555 of 2,497,738 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
126 ( #5,195 of 2,497,738 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes