Brexit and Trump: Which Theory of Social Stasis and Social Change Copes Best With the New Populism?

Frontiers in Psychology 13 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Why do voters seek to change the political landscape or to retain it? System justification theory proposes that a separate system motive to preserve the existing order drives support for the status-quo, and that this motivation operates independently from personal and collective interests. But how does this explanation apply to recent populist shifts in the political order such as Brexit and the emergence of Donald Trump? While the system motive may seem useful in understanding why the usual progressives may want to stick with an established order, it seems insufficient to explain why the more conservative voters would want to upend the establishment. Thus, we compared SJT’s system motive explanation for the system attitudes of voters on both sides of the political divide to an alternative explanation drawn from the newer social identity model of system attitudes. According to SIMSA, the difficulty in explaining the system attitudes of Brexit/Trump and Remain/Clinton voters from SJT’s system motive standpoint can be resolved by focusing instead on the collective interests that both camps seek to satisfy with their votes. We examined these explanations in two studies conducted soon after Brexit and Trump’s election in 2016, with results providing more support for SIMSA than for SJT.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Trump, Populism, Fascism, and the Road Ahead. [REVIEW]Harry van der Linden - 2017 - Radical Philosophy Review 20 (2):355-365.
Technology and democracy: three lessons from Brexit.Luciano Floridi - 2016 - Philosophy and Technology 29 (3):189-193.
Brexit, Positional Populism, and the Declining Appeal of Valence Politics.Colin Hay & Cyril Benoît - 2019 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 31 (3-4):389-404.
Reflections on three populisms.Akeel Bilgrami - 2018 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 44 (4):453-462.
Assessing Trump’s Legacy for Catholics.Ryan J. Barilleaux - 2021 - Catholic Social Science Review 26:153-168.
Computational Transformation of the Public Sphere: Theories and Cases.S. M. Amadae (ed.) - 2020 - Helsinki: Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Helsinki.
The Myths of Brexit.John Cromby - 2019 - Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology 29 (1):56-66.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-06-05

Downloads
2 (#1,635,221)

6 months
1 (#1,042,085)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Mark Rubin
Durham University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations