An Ethic for the Military: Establishing and Grounding a Professional Military Ethic for the Military Forces in the United States

Dissertation, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (1996)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This dissertation seeks to establish and ground a professional military ethic, a body of principles of right conduct for the military forces of the United States. To accomplish this, the dissertation answers the following questions with respect to the military and the professional military ethic: Can a state justify having and using military forces? If a state can justify using military force, does the use of that force fall within the boundaries of morality? Does the military profession need a professional military ethic? What is the professional military ethic? Where does the professional military ethic come from? Why should a military professional follow the professional military ethic? What kind of moral theory can ground the professional military ethic and the socio-moral framework presumed by that ethic? ;The professional military ethic, developed and codified in Chapter III, does not stand alone. It is one of many practical ethics that fit within the larger moral framework of our society, our common system of rules, both requirements and prohibitions that guide our behavior. ;The moral theory that underlies both the professional military ethic and the moral framework presumed by that ethic presupposes moral reality as well as moral agency. It emphasizes our need, as persons, to direct and control our own lives and to hold ourselves responsible for our actions. It recognizes that each of us is accountable for our individual actions, which means we find it necessary to explain and justify our actions in a manner that stands rational criticism, from ourselves as well as others. ;Our moral reality and our reason for behaving morally are both grounded in the structure of personhood and rational agency. Behaving morally is part of being a military professional. This is because we as persons are beings who possess a moral perspective. If we choose to ignore that perspective, deliberately suppressing it, we do violence to our self-image as rational beings who direct and control our own lives

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,593

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Army officers' professional ethic: past, present, and future.Matthew Moten - 2010 - [Carlisle, PA]: Strategic Studies Institute, U.S. Army War College.
Moral Coherence in Professional Ethics: The American Military.Anthony Elwood Hartle - 1982 - Dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin
The Army's professional military ethic in an era of persistent conflict.Don M. Snider - 2009 - Carlisle, PA: Strategic Studies Institute, U.S. Army War College. Edited by Paul Oh & Kevin Toner.
Torture and the military profession.Jessica Wolfendale - 2007 - New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.
The ethics of espionage.Tony Pfaff & Jeffrey R. Tiel - 2004 - Journal of Military Ethics 3 (1):1-15.
Threats to military professionalism: international perspectives.Douglas Lindsay & Jeffrey M. Stouffer (eds.) - 2012 - Kingston, Ont.: Canadian Defence Academy Press.
Public Trust in a Military Force.Asa Kasher - 2003 - Journal of Military Ethics 2 (1):20-45.
Honor and the Military.Peter Olsthoorn - 2006 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 20 (1):159-172.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-06

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references