The Socratic Paradoxes and the Greek Mind [Book Review]

Review of Metaphysics 21 (3):558-559 (1968)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This work is a study of Plato's ethical theory and in particular his paradoxical theses that virtue is knowledge and vice is ignorance and that no one voluntarily does evil. In the opening chapters O'Brien discusses Plato's debt to Homer and Hesiod and to the historians and tragedians. The succeeding chapters are devoted to an analysis of the ethical doctrines of over a dozen dialogues ranging from the Apology to the Laws. The principles of interpretation employed in the analysis are: 1) each doctrine must be understood in relation to every other as well as to the whole, 2) we must give a literary analysis of the dialogues in addition to a textual and philosophical one, since Plato often prefers to suggest his view through his literary art rather than give them explicit statement, and 3) statements must be interpreted in context. From an application of these principles, Professor O'Brien concludes that Plato's ethical theory constitutes a unified set of doctrines. Elements which are often thought to be antithetic, i.e., the Socratic paradoxes and the partition of the soul, are seen to be complementary. The one affirms the rational unity of human nature and action and the other, the irrational multiplicity of both. In his words, they affirm "... virtue is knowledge, and it is more than knowledge." The book contains a long bibliography and an extensive index of topics discussed and texts cited. As a result, O'Brien's view on nearly every topic and text is readily accessible.—O. J. L.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Socratic paradoxes and the Greek mind.Michael John O'Brien - 1967 - Chapel Hill,: University of North Carolina Press.
The dramatic sources of philosophy.Amelie Oksenberg Rorty - 2008 - Philosophy and Literature 32 (1):pp. 11-30.
Zeno's paradoxes and continuity.Ian Mueller - 1969 - Mind 78 (309):129-131.
The socratic paradoxes.Gerasimos Santas - 1964 - Philosophical Review 73 (2):147-164.
The Socratic Paradoxes in Plato. [REVIEW]W. E. Charlton - 1971 - The Classical Review 21 (01):31-.
Xenophon and the socratic paradoxes.Craig Walton - 1978 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 16 (1):687-700.
Nature's God: Emerson and the Greeks.Peter Murphy - 2008 - Thesis Eleven 93 (1):64-71.
Freundschaft bei Aristoteles.Hans-Klaus Keul - 2004 - Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch Fur Antike Und Mittelalter 9 (1):51-80.
Mind and Paradox.Paul Saka - 2013 - Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 25 (3):377-87.
The world of Parmenides: essays on the pre-Socratic Enlightenment.Karl Raimund Popper - 1998 - New York: Routledge. Edited by Arne Friemuth Petersen & Jørgen Mejer.
Paradoxes of intensionality.Dustin Tucker & Richmond H. Thomason - 2011 - Review of Symbolic Logic 4 (3):394-411.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-03-18

Downloads
14 (#961,492)

6 months
1 (#1,533,009)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references