Libertarianism Without Inequality

Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press UK (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Michael Otsuka sets out to vindicate left-libertarianism, a political philosophy which combines stringent rights of control over one's own mind, body, and life with egalitarian rights of ownership of the world. Otsuka reclaims the ideas of John Locke from the libertarian Right, and shows how his Second Treatise of Government provides the theoretical foundations for a left-libertarianism which is both more libertarian and more egalitarian than the Kantian liberal theories of John Rawls and Thomas Nagel. Otsuka's libertarianism is founded on a right of self-ownership. Here he is at one with 'right-wing' libertarians, such as Robert Nozick, in endorsing the highly anti-paternalistic and anti-moralistic implications of this right. But he parts company with these libertarians in so far as he argues that such a right is compatible with a fully egalitarian principle of equal opportunity for welfare. In embracing this principle, his own version of left-libertarianism is more strongly egalitarian than others which are currently well known. Otsuka argues that an account of legitimate political authority based upon the free consent of each is strengthened by the adoption of such an egalitarian principle. He defends a pluralistic, decentralized ideal of political society as a confederation of voluntary associations. Part I of Libertarianism without Inequality concerns the natural rights of property in oneself and the world. Part II considers the natural rights of punishment and self-defence that form the basis for the government's authority to legislate and punish. Part III explores the nature and limits of the powers of governments which are created by the consensual transfer of the natural rights of the governed. Libertarianism without Inequality is a book which everyone interested in political theory should read

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,122

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Does left-libertarianism have coherent foundations?Mathias Risse - 2004 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 3 (3):337-364.
Review of Michael Otsuka Libertarianism Without Inequality. [REVIEW]Anca Gheaus - 2006 - Imprints. Egalitarian Theoy and Practice 9 (2):141-50.
Libertarianism.Jan Narveson - 2013 - In Hugh LaFollette & Ingmar Persson (eds.), The Blackwell Guide to Ethical Theory. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. pp. 373-393.
Libertarianism without inequality. [REVIEW]Gopal Sreenivasan - 2007 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 74 (3):792-796.
Community in a new libertarianism: Rejoinder to Legutko.Peter Simpson - 1995 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 9 (3):427-429.
Inequality.Larry S. Temkin - 1993 - Oxford University Press. Edited by Louis P. Pojman & Robert Westmoreland.
Left-Libertarianism and Private Discrimination.Peter Vallentyne - 2006 - San Diego Law Review 43:981-994.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
188 (#99,676)

6 months
12 (#145,875)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Michael Otsuka
Rutgers - New Brunswick

Citations of this work

The Oxford Handbook of Philosophical Methodology.Herman Cappelen, Tamar Gendler & John Hawthorne (eds.) - 2016 - Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
Rights.Leif Wenar - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Public Reason.Jonathan Quong - 2013 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
The Methodology of Political Theory.Christian List & Laura Valentini - 2016 - In Herman Cappelen, Tamar Gendler & John P. Hawthorne (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophical Methodology. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
Distributive justice.Julian Lamont & Christi Favor - 2012 - In Peter Adamson (ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

View all 78 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references