Politics, Philosophy and Economics 14 (1):23-52 (2015)
AbstractIn modern representative democracies, much healthcare is publicly funded or provided and so the question of what healthcare systems should do is a matter of public policy. Given that public resources are inevitably limited, what should be done and who should benefit from healthcare? It is a dilemma for policymakers and a subject of debate within several disciplines, but rarely across disciplines. In this paper, I draw on thinking from several disciplines and especially philosophy, economics, and systems theory. I conclude that economist and philosopher John Broome’s writing provides the framework for an answer: a healthcare system in a democracy should do as much good as possible, although sometimes we should sacrifice some overall good for the sake of fairness. This leaves open some detailed questions about what in practice we consider to be good and fair, and about when some good should be traded off in order to be fair. The answers to these questions depend on our values, or as explained by systems theory, our weltanschauung. How policy decisions should be made when citizens’ values differ is a subject of extensive academic debate. However, it is a separate question. Representative democracies have mechanisms for resolving such debates
Similar books and articles
In a democracy, what should a healthcare system do? A dilemma for public policymakers.Malcolm Oswald - 2013 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics (1):1470594-13497670.
How do we want to grow old? Anti‐ageing‐medicine and the scope of public healthcare in liberal democracies.Mark Schweda & Georg Marckmann - 2013 - Bioethics 27 (7):357-364.
Provision of healthcare in the context of financial crisis: approaches to the Greek health system and international implications.Charalampos Milionis - 2013 - Nursing Philosophy 14 (1):17-27.
Healthcare regulation as a tool for public accountability.Rui Nunes, Guilhermina Rego & Cristina Brandão - 2009 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 12 (3):257-264.
Reification and compassion in medicine: A tale of two systems.Anna Smajdor - 2013 - Clinical Ethics 8 (4):1477750913502620.
Inequalities and healthcare reform in Chile: equity of what?J. Burrows - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (9):e13-e13.
The Estonian Healthcare System and the Genetic Database Project: From Limited Resources to Big Hopes.Margit Sutrop & Kadri Simm - 2004 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 13 (3):254-262.
Rationing, inefficiency and the role of clinicians.Kristin Voigt - 2014 - Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (2):94-96.
Commentary.John Hubert & Susan Sherwin - 1998 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 7 (4):366-370.
Public Accountability and Sunshine Healthcare Regulation.Rui Nunes, Cristina Brandão & Guilhermina Rego - 2011 - Health Care Analysis 19 (4):352-364.
The Ethics of Aggressive Discharge Planning.Alister Browne - 2010 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 19 (1):75.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Epistemic and non-epistemic values in economic evaluations of public health.Alessandra Cenci & M. Azhar Hussain - 2019 - Journal of Economic Methodology 27 (1):66-88.
Do Healthcare Professionals have Different Views about Healthcare Rationing than College Students? A Mixed Methods Study in Portugal.Micaela Pinho, Ana Pinto Borges & Richard Cookson - 2018 - Public Health Ethics 11 (1):90-102.