Classical Quarterly 36 (02):496- (1986)

Abstract
The difficulty of this little poem is shown by the facts that Ausonius had no idea what it was about, and that Westendorp Boerma's commentary takes 22 pages to explicate its five lines. The latter relies on Quintilian 8.3.27ff., who quotes the poem, saying that Vergil wrote it to attack a certain Cimber for his taste in obsolete words. This is no doubt the Annius Cimber whom Augustus ridiculed when reprimanding Mark Antony for a similar foible and who, as an antiquarius is contrasted with the Asiatici oratores. For convenience, I have kept Westendorp Boerma's text, but I take issue with his interpretation on two points. 4 tau Gallicum: since Bücheler tentatively suggested it in RhM 38 , 508, the standard explanation of this has been to point out that a number of Latin inscriptions in Gaul use a Greek θ or else a barred D , to represent what appears to have been a dental fricative elsewhere indicated in Latin by -sd- or -st-. Thus Frank, AJP 56 , 255, quotes HYÐRITANVS for what is elsewhere spelled Thysdritanus, and says that ‘Ð clearly represents the best that one Celt could do with sd’. On the basis of this supposed Gallic incompetence, Frank went on to see the repeated -st- sounds in the poem as some sort of joke on the orator's inability to pronounce this sound. His view seems to have been generally accepted. There seems to me a profound error in this viewpoint which shows cultural imperialism at its worst. First, let us note that none of the examples of alleged substitution are in Latin words; they are native names for people or places or things. The Latin names by which we know some of them are only the approximation of foreigners, and not in any sense the ‘correct’ names of those people or places
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0009838800012234
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,257
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Notes on Vergil.W. C. F. Walters - 1894 - The Classical Review 8 (06):250-251.
Notes on the First Eclogue of Vergil.T. G. Tucker - 1908 - The Classical Review 22 (08):243-244.
Notes on Vergil and Tacitus.F. W. Thomas - 1898 - The Classical Review 12 (01):33-.
Vergil in the Shadow of Vesuvius.Marcello Gigante - 2004 - In David Armstrong (ed.), Vergil, Philodemus, and the Augustans. University of Texas Press. pp. 85-99.
Vergil's Epicureanism in His Early Poems.Régine Chambert - 2004 - In David Armstrong (ed.), Vergil, Philodemus, and the Augustans. University of Texas Press. pp. 43-60.
Tragic Vergil: Rewriting Vergil as a Tragedy in the Cento Medea.Scott C. McGill - 2002 - Classical World: A Quarterly Journal on Antiquity 95 (2).
Vergil and Music, in Diogenes of Babylon and Philodemus.Daniel Delattre - 2004 - In David Armstrong (ed.), Vergil, Philodemus, and the Augustans. University of Texas Press. pp. 245-263.
Varius and Vergil : Two Pupils of Philodemus in Propertius 2.34?Francis Cairns - 2004 - In David Armstrong (ed.), Vergil, Philodemus, and the Augustans. University of Texas Press. pp. 299-321.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-12-09

Total views
5 ( #1,199,807 of 2,499,748 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #418,066 of 2,499,748 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes