Rights and Corporate Social Responsibility: Competing or Complementary Approaches to Poverty Reduction and Socioeconomic Rights?
Journal of Business Ethics 136 (2):329-347 (2016)
AbstractFollowing the situation of poverty in the rights paradigm, this paper explores the links between the rights-based and corporate social responsibility approaches to the realization of socioeconomic rights in the broader context of an emerging recognition of CSR as private regulation of business behaviour. It examines complex theoretical and practical dimensions of responsibility and potential contributions of businesses to poverty alleviation and clarifies the apparent paradox of legal compulsion of essentially voluntary CSR activities. Rather than treat rights and CSR as parallel approaches to protecting socioeconomic rights, it is argued that CSR can be part of a coherent framework of laws and policies for legally translating broad human rights commitments to poverty reduction into concrete programmes. The paper demonstrates how legally propped CSR arrangements can support poverty reduction and appropriate task-specific contextualised definitions and boundaries of CSR that complement the rights-based approach. It is argued that human rights principles have normative dimensions to guide and help formulate policies, programmes and practices, which in turn allow for a creative use of and legal prop to CSR. The conceptualization of human rights is not restricted to one implementation method, and CSR can partly satisfy states’ human rights obligations and transcend the narrow conventional human rights discourse on obligations of non-state actors.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
Corporate Social Responsibility Theories: Mapping the Territory. [REVIEW]Elisabet Garriga & Domènec Melé - 2004 - Journal of Business Ethics 53 (1-2):51-71.
Basic Rights: Subsistence, Affluence, and U.S. Foreign Policy.Henry Shue - 1980 - Princeton University Press.
Does Global Business Have a Responsibility to Promote Just Institutions?Nien-hê Hsieh - 2009 - Business Ethics Quarterly 19 (2):251-273.
Elements of a Theory of Human Rights.S. E. N. Amartya - 2004 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 32 (4):315–356.
Can Corporations Be Citizens? Corporate Citizenship as a Metaphor for Business Participation in Society.Jeremy Moon, Andrew Crane & Dirk Matten - 2005 - Business Ethics Quarterly 15 (3):429-453.
Citations of this work
Corporate Social Responsibility for Poverty Alleviation: An Integrated Research Framework.Rita D. Medina‐Muñoz & Diego R. Medina‐Muñoz - 2020 - Business Ethics: A European Review 29 (1):3-19.
Corporate Social Responsibility as Obligated Internalisation of Social Costs.Andrew Johnston, Kenneth Amaeshi, Emmanuel Adegbite & Onyeka Osuji - 2021 - Journal of Business Ethics 170 (1):39-52.
Explaining Poverty and Business with Network Concepts Analysis.Elder Semprebon, Melody de Campos Soares Porsse, Elis Cristina Gurak & Flavia Dameto - 2020 - Business and Society Review 125 (3):311-327.
Similar books and articles
Re-Thinking 'Spheres of Responsibility': Business Responsibility for Indirect Harm. [REVIEW]Kate Macdonald - 2011 - Journal of Business Ethics 99 (4):549 - 563.
Corporate Responsibility for Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: Rights in Search of a Remedy?Justine Nolan & Luke Taylor - 2009 - Journal of Business Ethics 87 (2):433 - 451.
Global Poverty and Responsibility: Identifying the Duty-Bearers of Human Rights. [REVIEW]Abigail Gosselin - 2006 - Human Rights Review 8 (1):35-52.
Corporate Responsibility Standards: Current Implications and Future Possibilities for Peace Through Commerce.Charles P. Koerber - 2009 - Journal of Business Ethics 89 (S4):461 - 480.
Business Policies on Human Rights: An Analysis of Their Content and Prevalence Among FTSE 100 Firms. [REVIEW]Lutz Preuss & Donna Brown - 2012 - Journal of Business Ethics 109 (3):289-299.
Corporate Social Responsibility and International Human Rights Law.Robert McCorquodale - 2009 - Journal of Business Ethics 87 (2):385 - 400.
Winner of The Philosophical Quarterly Essay Prize 2004: Poverty and Rights.James W. Nickel - 2005 - Philosophical Quarterly 55 (220):385 - 402.
The Case for Leverage-Based Corporate Human Rights Responsibility.Stepan Wood - 2012 - Business Ethics Quarterly 22 (1):63-98.
Good Corporate Governance Initiative to Ensure Corporate Social Responsibility: A Study of the State of the Art in Rwanda.Rama B. Rao - 2007 - International Corporate Responsibility Series 3:395-414.
Human Rights and the New Corporate Accountability: Learning From Recent Developments in Corporate Criminal Liability. [REVIEW]Aurora Voiculescu - 2009 - Journal of Business Ethics 87 (2):419 - 432.
Violence Against Women and Economic, Social and Cultural Rights in Africa.Sheila Dauer & Mayra Gomez - 2006 - Human Rights Review 7 (2):49-58.
Global Responsibility for Human Rights: World Poverty and the Development of International Law.Margot E. Salomon & Foreword by Stephen P. Marks - 2007 - Oxford University Press.