Recognizing strong random reals

Review of Symbolic Logic 1 (1):56-63 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

1. Characterizing randomness. Consider a physical process that, if suitably idealized, generates an indefinite sequence of independent random bits. One such process might be radioactive decay of a lump of uranium whose mass is kept at just the level needed to ensure that the probability is one-half that no alpha particle is emitted in the nth microsecond of the experiment. Let us think of the bits as drawn from {0, 1} and denote the resulting sequence by x with coordinates x0, x1, . . .. Now wouldn’t it be odd if there were a computer program P with the following property?

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Subclasses of the Weakly Random Reals.Johanna N. Y. Franklin - 2010 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 51 (4):417-426.
Schnorr Randomness.Rodney G. Downey & Evan J. Griffiths - 2004 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 69 (2):533 - 554.
Every 2-random real is Kolmogorov random.Joseph S. Miller - 2004 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 69 (3):907-913.
Relative Randomness and Real Closed Fields.Alexander Raichev - 2005 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 70 (1):319 - 330.
Remarks on "Random Sequences".Branden Fitelson & Daniel Osherson - 2015 - Australasian Journal of Logic 12 (1).
Relative Randomness and Cardinality.George Barmpalias - 2010 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 51 (2):195-205.
Computational randomness and lowness.Sebastiaan A. Terwijn & Domenico Zambella - 2001 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 66 (3):1199-1205.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
74 (#218,767)

6 months
39 (#93,973)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Limiting recursion.E. Mark Gold - 1965 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 30 (1):28-48.
Randomness Is Unpredictability.Antony Eagle - 2005 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 56 (4):749-790.

View all 8 references / Add more references