Shape-slant invariance as tested by computer-generated perspective figures by children

&
Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 21 (1):26-28 (1983)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.3758/bf03329944

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Perceived Shape at a Slant as a Function of Processing Time and Processing Load.William Epstein, Gary Hatfield & Gerard Muise - 1977 - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 3:473–483.
Factorization, Algebraization, and Shape Invariance.A. Inomata & O. Kizilkaya - 1998 - Foundations of Physics 28 (1):107-124.
Perceived shape and its dependency on perceived slant.Peter K. Kaiser - 1967 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 75 (3):345.
The induction of nonveridical slant and the perception of shape.William Epstein, Helen Bontrager & John Park - 1962 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 63 (5):472.
Role of apparent slant in shape judgments.Wilma A. Winnick & Ilana Rogoff - 1965 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 69 (6):554.
The relation of apparent shape to apparent slant in the perception of objects.Jacob Beck & James J. Gibson - 1955 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 50 (2):125.
Absolute threshold for visual slant: The effect of stimulus size and retinal perspective.Robert B. Freeman Jr - 1966 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 71 (2):170.
Perspective and form ratio as determinants of relative slant judgments.Myron L. Braunstein & John W. Payne - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 81 (3):584.
What's Wrong with Computer-Generated Images of Perfection in Advertising?Earl W. Spurgin - 2003 - Journal of Business Ethics 45 (3):257 - 268.
Perception of slant when perspective and stereopsis conflict: Experiments with aniseikonic lenses.B. J. Gillam - 1968 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 78 (2p1):299.
Effect of memory set size on visual evoked potential for digit and figure stimuli.Mariko Osaka & Naoyuki Osaka - 1983 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 21 (4):275-277.
Prism-generated and real pitch influence egocentric localization similarity; prism-generated and real slant don't.W. Li & L. Matin - 1993 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 31:367.
The perceived slant of visual surfaces—optical and geographical.James J. Gibson & Janet Cornsweet - 1952 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 44 (1):11.
Language-independent working memory as measured by Japanese and English reading span tests.Mariko Osaka & Naoyuki Osaka - 1992 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 30 (4):287-289.
How specific is the shape bias?Paul Bloom - manuscript

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-22

Downloads
25 (#614,662)

6 months
5 (#652,053)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references