Why I Am a Presentist

Science in Context 26 (4):595-609 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Both geologists and historians study the past, but they have divergent views of the present. Geologists are unambiguously presentist. They believe that the observable present is a crucial resource in understanding the past, because in the observable present we can see and study the processes that have occurred in the unobservable past. For geologists, it is largely uncontroversial that the past not only can but should be interpreted with reference to the present.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Presentism and ontological symmetry.Joseph Diekemper - 2005 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 83 (2):223 – 240.
Presentism, persistence and composition.Ernâni Magalhães - 2011 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 92 (4):509-523.
Twins' Paradox and Closed Timelike Curves: The Role of Proper Time and the Presentist View on Spacetime.Cord Friebe - 2012 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 43 (2):313-326.
Presentism and truth-making.Jonathan Tallant - 2009 - Erkenntnis 71 (3):407-416.
Presentism and the grounding of truth.Alex Baia - 2012 - Philosophical Studies 159 (3):341-356.
A Defense of Transient Presentism.M. Oreste Fiocco - 2007 - American Philosophical Quarterly 44 (3):191 - 212.
Back to Eternalism.Katherin Rogers - 2009 - Faith and Philosophy 26 (3):320-338.
Travelling in A- and B- Time.Theodore Sider - 2005 - The Monist 88 (3):329-335.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-27

Downloads
69 (#228,339)

6 months
16 (#138,396)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Naomi Oreskes
Harvard University